Advanced

Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0

GC5P8H0 top 25 favorites in HK
May 26, 2016 05:16AM
Hello, challenge cache is back, time to make more!

I would like to have a checker for this:
1. Country: Hong Kong
2. Found top 25 favourite cache
3. Excluding archived cache.
4. Owned as found

Thanks in advance.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/26/2016 12:29PM by ganja1447. (view changes)
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 08:08AM
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 08:32AM
Thanks for the checker, but I find a little problem.

Please try to execute the script with these 2 cachers and check the row at #12
a. wanrex
12 GC4CVYV 35 2013-05-31 Hotel Oi - International TB Exchange
--> This cache had been archived, so I expect this one won't show in the list

b. CX15
12 GC15VEH 31 2013-08-20 I Love Hong Kong


Just wonder, the list for different cachers are different?
Thanks in advance.
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 08:52AM
Can you update your results by using the self support under the support button.
It could be that your last log on this Cache is causing the problem.
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 09:11AM
Great, i don't know there is "Self-support" function before that post, it works now.
Thanks for much



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/26/2016 09:13AM by wanrex. (view changes)
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 11:42AM
Why exclude archived finds? Any reason that if a caches get archivet you get from ok to not ok on the challenge?
It in not against the guidelines and annoying it a cache get archived and dissapairs from the list.


A personal opinion that I have and created challenges for is that %FP and Wilson score for a cache is a better measurement for how good a cache is and as easy tro create an challenge on
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 11:47AM
I checked the new requirement on Challenge cache, you can't request cacher to find an "archived" cache.
And I guess it is reasonable to "exclude" archived cache, then new cacher can also have chance to complete the challenge, reasonable?
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 11:58AM
That it not how the checker or the rule works

The rule is "10 Requiring cachers to log caches that are disabled or archived."
No one thinks about archived if it is a challenge to have 1000 found logs but they will be included in that list. Your find count on gc.com includes them

The checker looks att the top FP list and and include all active caches and alos add archived you have found. You dont have to find new archived caches but old find are included
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 12:04PM
oh, i get what you mean.
Then really no need to "exclude archived", then it will be easier and cacher friendly i guess.
So, can you help to remove the ""excludeArchived": true,"?

Thanks.
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 12:13PM
Is it changed
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 12:39PM
Yes, updated, thx
Re: Checker Request for GC5P8H0
May 26, 2016 11:47AM
If you include archived finds , new cachers cannot fullfill the challenge
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login