Advanced

Re: Not usualy county checker

[Resolved] Not usualy county checker
February 20, 2019 05:30PM
Hello
For my cache GC83RQT I need a not usualy county checker.

To qualify, the geocacher need to fulfill all three condtion:

1) find at least one cache in 4 out of 6 given counties (poviats) in Łódzkie voivodship (Poland)

kutnowski
łowicki
rawski
skierniewicki
Skierniewice


2) find at least one cache in in 3 out of 5 given coounties (poviats) in Podlaskie voivodship (Poland)

wysokomazowiecki
grajewski
zambrowski
łomżyński
Łomża

3) find at least one cache in 22 out of 30 given counties (poviats) in Mazowieckie voivodship (Poland)

ciechanowski
garwoliński
gostyniński
grodziski
grójecki
legionowski
makowski
miński
mławski
nowodworski
ostrołęcki
ostrowski
otwocki
piaseczyński
płocki
płoński
pruszkowski
przasnyski
pułtuski
sierpecki
sochaczewski
warszawski zachodni
węgrowski
wołomiński
wyszkowski
żuromiński
żyrardowski
Ostrołęka
Płock
Warszawa


The reviewier said, that coindtions is ok. and will publish cache
Re: Not usualy county checker
February 20, 2019 06:09PM
For
1) find at least one cache in 4 out of 6 given counties (poviats) in Łódzkie voivodship (Poland)

kutnowski
łowicki
rawski
skierniewicki
Skierniewice

you only gave 5 counties

Which is the sixth county
Re: Not usualy county checker
February 20, 2019 06:15PM
Sorry. My mistake
Properly -
1) find at least one cache in in 3 out of 5 given coounties [...].
Re: Not usualy county checker
February 20, 2019 07:09PM
Here is the link https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC83RQT/40713

Please test and reply
Re: Not usualy county checker
February 20, 2019 07:32PM
Thx. Working fine.
Re: Not usualy county checker
February 21, 2019 11:21AM
sorry for the confusion. can you change the requirements regarding the number of found caches from one to two? further terms with no changes. I checked the searchers from my region and too many people can pass the challenge without any difficulty ?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login