Advanced

Re: Checker output inaccurate GC9ZW67

[Resolved] Checker output inaccurate GC9ZW67
October 17, 2022 04:33AM
The below attribute checker is outputting some negative attributes that do not exist. Is there any way to fix this issue?

https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9ZW67/72047

Below negative attributes are NOT available, there may be others:

NOT Access/parking fee (found 0)
NOT Climbing gear required (found 0)
NOT Boat required (found 0)
NOT Scuba gear required (found 0)
NOT May require wading (found 0)
NOT May require swimming (found 0)
NOT Dangerous animals (found 0)
NOT Ticks (found 0)
NOT Abandoned mine (found 0)
NOT Cliff/falling rocks (found 0)
NOT Hunting area (found 0)
NOT Dangerous area (found 0)
NOT Public transportation nearby (found 0)
NOT Thorns (found 0)
NOT Livestock nearby (found 0)
NOT Flashlight required (found 0)
NOT UV light required (found 0)
NOT May require snowshoes (found 0)
NOT May require cross country skis (found 0)
NOT Special tool required (found 0)
NOT Wireless beacon (found 0)
NOT Bonus cache (found 0)
NOT Power trail (found 0)
NOT Challenge cache (found 0)
NOT Geocaching.com solution checker (found 0)
NOT GeoTour (found 0)
NOT Partnership cache (found 0)

@ pieterix - Please attend



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/17/2022 04:40AM by vogelbird. (view changes)
Re: Checker output inaccurate GC9ZW67
October 18, 2022 12:50PM
Odd. I'm using PGC.GetAttributeList() to get the list of all the attributes and base my decision on whether to include or skip a negative attribute by whether it has a negative image or not. This used to work but it seems this function now returns negative images for ALL the attributes, which means I have no way to automatically skip a nonsensical negative attribute other than to hardcode the list. Will have to find an official list...
Re: Checker output inaccurate GC9ZW67
October 18, 2022 01:53PM
Hardcoded list added. Please try it and let me know if it's all good now?
Re: Checker output inaccurate GC9ZW67
October 18, 2022 11:46PM
Thankyou pieterix, that looks to be correct now :)

Cheers
Adriaan
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login