Advanced

Re: Static attribute vs attribute checker

[Resolved] Static attribute vs attribute checker
May 29, 2023 04:34PM
Hello Sir or Madam,

I'm working on building a few challenges built around combinations of attributes on the same cache. For example, across all your finds have you found attributes A and B together, B and C together, as well as A and B together. This could be done with a single find that has attribute A, B, and C. Since a geocache can have up to 15 attributes, that means a single cache could score you up to 105 combinations (15 choose 2).
To simplify things, I'm just focusing on the positive attributes and I'm skipping "partnership", "part of a geo-tour" and "lost and found" since they are pretty much no longer used. That leaves us with this list of 63 attributes:
  1. Abandoned mine nearby
  2. Access/parking fee
  3. Available 24/7
  4. Available in winter
  5. Bikes allowed
  6. Boat required
  7. Campfires allowed
  8. Camping nearby
  9. Cliffs/falling rocks nearby
  10. Climbing gear required
  11. Cross-country skis required
  12. Dangerous animals
  13. Dangerous area
  14. Difficult climbing
  15. Dogs allowed
  16. Drinking water nearby
  17. Field puzzle
  18. Flashlight required
  19. Food nearby
  20. Fuel nearby
  21. Hike between 1km-10km
  22. Hike longer than 10km
  23. Hike shorter than 1 km
  24. Horses allowed
  25. Hunting area
  26. In an abandoned structure
  27. In front yard (with permission)
  28. Kid-friendly
  29. May require snowshoes
  30. May require swimming
  31. May require wading
  32. Motorcycles allowed
  33. Needs maintenance
  34. Night cache
  35. Off-road vehicles allowed
  36. Park-and-grab
  37. Parking nearby
  38. Picnic tables available
  39. Poisonous plants
  40. Public transit available
  41. Quads allowed
  42. Recommended at night
  43. Recommended for tourists
  44. Restrooms available
  45. Scenic view
  46. Scuba gear required
  47. Seasonal access only
  48. Significant hike
  49. Snowmobiles allowed
  50. Special tool required
  51. Stealth required
  52. Stroller-accessible
  53. Takes less than 1 hour
  54. Teamwork required
  55. Telephone nearby
  56. Thorns
  57. Ticks
  58. Tree-climbing required
  59. Trucks/RVs accessible
  60. UV light required
  61. Watch for livestock
  62. Wheelchair-accessible
  63. Wireless beacon required

That should give 1953 possible combinations of attributes (63 choose 2). It will make a grid something like the one in this picture.
That is not accurate data, I just did the RANDBETWEEN function with conditional formatting to give a quick prototype.

The intent of this checker is to run as a reference 'static' checker, similar to https://project-gc.com/Challenges//71154
If you need a GC code, one of the challenges I'm building will be GCA9A93 and the challenge is to have found 500 combinations of attributes.

I don't know if this is realistically feasible with the LUA coding. I definitely don't want to make someone have to type custom code by hand for each of 1953 cells in a chart. If that is the case, please don't inflict this upon yourself. I am happy to type up whatever you need if I'm shown the format you want. Your team already does so much for the geocaching community, I don't want to be a burden. If this is too much, please tell me, "no".

Either way, thank you for your time and help.
CheekyBrit
Re: Static attribute vs attribute checker
May 29, 2023 07:41PM
That already exists (sort of):

https://project-gc.com/Challenges//76415

Is that close enough to what you want?
Re: Static attribute vs attribute checker
May 30, 2023 12:07AM
Wow! YES!!!!
That is amazing. Thank you for posting the link. Is there a list of these static checkers somewhere? Because they are the bomb dot com.
Re: Static attribute vs attribute checker
May 30, 2023 01:11AM
Unfortunately, no.
Re: Static attribute vs attribute checker
May 30, 2023 10:53AM
There's a list of them in the wiki but not all makers add theirs to the list: https://project-gc.com/w/Tools_in_the_checker_system
Re: Static attribute vs attribute checker
May 30, 2023 05:47PM
Oh, hah. Of course makers would not add to the list if they didn't know that a list existed. :)

I will look through and add some of my tools to the list.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login