Re: New checker for GCAFRGZ

Greetings! I am working on a series of 50 challenges, one for each of the 50 U.S. states. They mostly all follow the same format "Find ____ in 5 different states," but there are a few variations.

CHALLENGE FOR GCAFRGZ - Find caches in 6 different states in 6 consecutive days.

(This challenge requires cachers to find caches in 6 different states during any 6-day consecutive span. For example, if you have caches in 6 states all in one day, great, you qualify. If you find 2 states on Monday and 4 on Thursday, great, you qualify.)

If possible, can the output for the checker look like https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAFRFG/82172

THANKS!

...also new script required?

Thanks,
Hügh

This would require a new script, but it's not worth writing a script since it wouldn't be allowed under guideline 9:

Quote
Not acceptable
Specifying any element of a cache page (type, rating, etc.) or find count (above one per day) required during a streak.

What you're asking for is a streak with restrictions on region.

This challenge has already been approved by my local reviewer and is not considered a streak. The six states can be found during any six-day span, one per day, or all together on the same day.

New script not required! :)

Not sure how your reviewer is okay with it, because there's no way mine would be :). But if you're sure they are - here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAFRGZ/82317

Note: this one *doesn't* use the super generic script, so the output is formatted much more nicely. Let us know if this works for you.

New script not required! :)

Not sure how your reviewer is okay with it, because there's no way mine would be :). But if you're sure they are - here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAFRGZ/82317

Note: this one *doesn't* use the super generic script, so the output is formatted much more nicely. Let us know if this works for you.

This works great. Although, could you remove Locationless caches from the list of qualifying caches? Thanks.

Okay, updated - all other types are possible (minus locationless and ALs).

Perfect! Thanks!