Advanced

Re: GCAM6PJ again

[Awaiting feedback] GCAM6PJ again
March 16, 2024 12:40PM
Hi there @vogelbird It looks like there are nowhere near enough qualifiers around locally. Can you please change this one to make is anywhere in the world, not just Australia?

Thank you

https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAM6PJ/86156

Thank you
Adriaan
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 16, 2024 06:26PM
Config adjusted , please test
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 16, 2024 10:09PM
I am getting a "Caught Error"

[string ""]:76: bad argument #4 to 'format' (string expected, got nil)

Any ideas?
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 16, 2024 10:43PM
I will have to ask the scriptwriter
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 17, 2024 05:34AM
ok, thank you
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 17, 2024 10:36AM
I used a different script for the time being https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAM6PJ/86487

You don't qualify yet so you can see your result
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 17, 2024 10:57AM
or this one https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAM6PJ/86490

Tell me which one you prefer
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 17, 2024 12:31PM
I like the output style of 86490, but it doesnt tell you about the ones you are getting close for.

it is possible to produce more results for 86487? say also add lgas that you have found 2 and 3 types?
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 17, 2024 06:29PM
Sorry both are multi scripts so not much I can do about the output

Your best solution is the script by Hügh
Re: GCAM6PJ again
March 17, 2024 08:34PM
I have made the required fix. 86156 is working again.
Re: GCAM6PJ again
April 15, 2024 06:56PM
This thread has not received any further feedback and will therefor be moved to ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed). Should the requester have any queries he can raise his question on this thread in the archived section,
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login