Advanced

Re: Error in checker

Error in checker
October 18, 2023 09:42PM
It seems to me it's a very tricky (old) challenge. Anyway, I keep getting an error message:
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC4R8ZT

Thanks. (Hi Hugh! sorry can't umlaud)
Re: Error in checker
October 18, 2023 10:31PM
Interesting, the checker works fine for me with your username. (You've done step 1-5 according to the result I'm getting.)
Re: Error in checker
October 18, 2023 11:43PM
Sadly still not working for me. (I didn't expect to fulfill it, just checking how far I managed to get!) I've never had this issue on Project GC. :-(

Screenshot attached. Or not... I don't have a place to host it. Copy pasting the text:
Error

Execution time (s)
Peak memory usage (kB)
Error message
Execution status
Error log [blank]
Script output [blank]
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 12:30PM
I am also running out of memory time when using your name
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 01:23PM
I asked about this in the discord. It looks like the issue is that the script is using many bookmark-lists, these get stored on the servers for a short while and therefor the second run of the username shortly after is more likely to succeed (since it already has the lists).
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 04:24PM
Interesting, as I did run it several times in case the first one was just a random error.

I'm not a super high finds cacher either so it seems so odd.

If anyone runs it successfully, I'd be happy to be sent the results (or post here). Again though, just curious since I know I don't qualify.

[edit] p.s. Just went to the checker link and got this: "Error. As a non paying user you are only allowed 10 checker runs per day." So I guess people have been checking for me as I only ran it once or twice yesterday (when I posted a reply), and haven't run anything today! Sigh.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/19/2023 04:27PM by CCFwasG. (view changes)
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 04:33PM
That's not how the system works. You get to run 10 checker runs per day, any name, any checker. A paid user could run your name 100 times in the checker and you'd still get to run it in the same checker, as long as you haven't ran any other names in any other checkers eating up your checker runs.

Your results are these:
Quote
checker
Thanks! Whilst I have not yet reached the top these are the steps I have completed so far, which I would like to lock in.

Step 1: 01/02/2005
Traditional Cache: GCMH13 - Burghfield 'not so' Common

Step 2: 08/03/2014
Multi-cache: GC4NPMQ - Church Micro 4275...Steeple Barton
Micro: GC4MEVQ - Rock A Conker

Step 3: 20/06/2015
Unknown Cache: GC54F7B - Oxford Steganography #2 - Selected Text
Micro: GC5Q8QB - Oxford's City Gates
Difficulty 2: GC54F7J - Oxford Steganography #3 - X-Ray

Step 4: 15/03/2017
Traditional Cache: GC46C7Y - Historical Hawarden 6 - Old School
Micro: GCQ5PN - Gladstone's -It's in the bag
Difficulty 2: GC24FGG - Hawarden Old Water Mill
Small: GC46C8R - Historical Hawarden 7- Motte and Bailey

Step 5: 09/04/2021
Multi-cache: GC96TB0 - 191st Street Tunnel Beautification Project
Micro: GC1GRCG - Justice League: Apache Chief
Difficulty 2: GC190GN - New York Subway
Small: GC692FQ - Inwood Hill Series: Nature's Storage Edge
Before 2010: GC1T0PZ - New York Yankee #23 - Don Mattingly

Step 6: Criteria Not Met
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 04:40PM
Pleu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's not how the system works. You get to run 10
> checker runs per day, any name, any checker. A
> paid user could run your name 100 times in the
> checker and you'd still get to run it in the same
> checker, as long as you haven't ran any other
> names in any other checkers eating up your checker
> runs.

Huge thanks for the results Pleu. I understand about the lists, it's just that it didn't work for me running it again after the first attempt, which sounds like it's an anomaly.
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 04:55PM
CCFwasG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Huge thanks for the results Pleu. I understand
> about the lists, it's just that it didn't work for
> me running it again after the first attempt, which
> sounds like it's an anomaly.


It could be a combination of issues. I don't have insight in how things work "under the hood" but I think it's mentioned somewhere that paid membership gives you priority in some areas when asking for data, so it could be something like that which happens to make my run being a second faster and therefor being able to finis before it runs out of time.
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 04:35PM
And it's not because of your amount of finds, it's because of all the bookmark lists the script uses to determine the "Themed collection"-caches.
Re: Error in checker
October 19, 2023 06:36PM
Pleu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And it's not because of your amount of finds, it's
> because of all the bookmark lists the script uses
> to determine the "Themed collection"-caches.

Oh yes, I totally understood that, thank you. Really appreciate your help for something this trivial. Very grateful!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login