Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7MZ50/45943 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Alright, swapped Armenia for Turkey. Link is still the same.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8E481/45922 Let us know if it's suitable. Btw there is no clear definition of Europe, I just copied the one that most checkers here use. You can see the list of countries included when you click the "Show" button next to "Tag config". Most notably, Russia is included while Turkey is not. Also there are some placesby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Small mistake in your config, should be "type", not "types". Also you may want to print the actual profile name for users not having any valid finds, instead of litereally profileName ;) (line 272)by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No problem, already doneby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges//45852 Let us know if it's suitable. Can you let us know the GC code?by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have written a script that makes it possible to feed some data into a SAT solver (not that important how it works, just know that it's a program that can solve the task) and let that do the work. It 's quite a bit faster: For users where the script would take around 20 seconds to find that the user does not fulfill the challenge, the SAT solver can figure that out in about 0.5s. Noby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Thanks for the feedback. QuoteI only tested for the 2 first points since I didn't know how to test for the 3rd. Yeah, the third is hard to tell. I was just thinking about cases where you'd think a user would be really close to fulfilling the challenge, but the srcipt somehow tells you that in can at best fill 30 cells or so. Maybe when I get it to work better with some external stuby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Ok, here we go again! Here's the newest iteration of the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges//45690 I haven't been able to do many significant improvements, so in the end what I did is take the method that works really well for users fulfilling the challenge (method 2) and let that run for a bit (about 5 seconds). If by then no solution was found the script switches backby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8EQQW/45665 Let us know if it's suitable. edit: removed since vogelbird's is exactly the same and was earlierby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Alright, quick update. So first of all there are two possibilities with the preprocessing here: 1. It's done exhaustively once before the backtracking stuff, like you did for your account. Now this works well for your account in particular since you have many countries with few finds. However for other users, such as the two you listed, it doesn't help that much and it still timeby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I was refering to the DT first search, which is what GreyHams suggested and which I did now. I have a WIP version where I do some preprocessing. On predator is does reduce the time to 15s and the backtracking steps to 31924. However I checked for your account and it seems there might be something wrong still. I filled the following DT ratings only by doing deductions as you described: 4.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I tried my luck and I think it works quite ok for now. Here's a temporary checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC87FM1/45629 I'll clean up the output later, that shouldn't take too long. I'll see whether I can also display the best progress for users who haven't completed the challenge yet. Got an idea for that, think shouldn't be too hard either. Nowby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8EG5B/45547 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Seems like the challenge you linked has nothing to do with the challenge you requested. Here's one for your request, given you're ok with the meteorological seasons rather than the astronomical seasons. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8EFFP/45531 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
So back to 200?by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sure, bumped it up.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DZY0/45511 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well, it's not a simple Let/Lon question. Quote3. The posted coordinates are what determine which sector a cache is counted in. This is especially important for Multis and Mysteries. The location of the stages or the final do not matter. (Do not use caches where the final is more than 2 miles from or in a different sector than the posted coordinates.) 4. Your six caches must each be aby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8EDPG/45482 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8EDDK/45475 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Changed to 6by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Changed to 4by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Changed to 5by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is already at 5. edit: which caches for which profiles?by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DZHM/45382 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DZKA/45381 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DZJ2/45380 Let us know if it's suitable. Btw I find it funny you eaily qualify for this one while not fulfilling the other checker requests yet. Even requiring 4/4 attributes you'd have 104 fitting finds. I guess it's true what they say about the Australian outback ;)by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DZKF/45379 Again, it seems you don't qualify yet with only 2 out of 12 found. Even with just requiring 4/6 you'd only have 4 fitting finds.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)