Hello! I'd like to have a checker for the forth challenge cache about Bremen, this time with 50 logs in each region, including the surrounding regions, or, as we say here "umzu", thus named "Hardcore" The checker that's used for the second, similar, one is https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA7G8M/76823 , only with just 5 caches for each region. The cache is plannby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello! I'd like to have a checker for the third challenge cache about Bremen, this time with 50 logs in each region, thus named "Hardcore". The checker that's used for the first, similar, one is https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA7G8Q/76821 , only with just 5 caches for each of the two region. The cache is planned for some time in September, I still have to find 20 in Breby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works like a charm, thanks a lot!by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Are they included? In my Checker with continents they are not: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8NXTZ/59479 It precluded the locationless thingies. Grüße vom Sängerby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Top, Thank you!by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello! I'd like to have a checker for the second challenge cache about Bremen, with 5 logs in each region, but this time including the surrounding regions, or, as we say here "umzu". The concerning regions are the "Landkreise" from Niedersachsen (from north to south) Cuxhaven (Lkr), Wesermarsch (Lkr), Osterholz (Lkr), Verden (Lkr), Delmenhorst, Diepholz (Lkr), and of coby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello! I'd like to have a checker similar to this one https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7N9MR/34959 , but with 5 logs in each region. The cache is planned for sometime in May. Thanks in advance, Saengerby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Okay, you can close this as unsolvable, and I have to live with a bit less strict Challenge.by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes there definitely is a misunderstanding. As that's something prominent in the stats on the profile page at geocaching.org itself, it never occurred to me that it was something verboten. The current status is of course very far away from what I intended. That's a pity. I have to look for something else, that would fit the 256-criteria and is a wee bit more ambitious.by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The whole podium (FTF, STF and TTF) all got the green light despite not having a month with more than 256 finds. That's a pity.by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi vogelbird (or whoever else can look into it)! I just received a message from a friend, who tried the checker, and got the go despite not fulfilling the last requirement. I checked my own response again, and I as well got a wrong response, I fulfil the requirement, but just once, not twice, as the checker stated. Is there something wrong? And if so, can it be repaired?by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Adjusted the config Indeed you did, and just right so! Helemaal bedankt!by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You created a checker for a cache in my old homezone a few weeks ago, I had planned to hide the container and publish it around eastern, while I was visiting my parents (the cache maintenance team in my old homezone), but after I published the 3x3x3x3 and 2x2x2x2 in Bremen, and am just waiting for the 1x1x1x1 to get the OK from the reviewers, I decided, it would be better, to have a 4x4x4x4 hereby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks a lot!by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello, I just got a reviewer note, that my cache has a wrong text in the listing. But it was a wrong number in the checker. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8R541/59517 It should be 2 container sizes, not 4. I don't know, whether it's just the text or the checker itself, that has this wrong. Could you please adjust this?by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Worked as well as a charm, everything's fine, now I just have to place the container and hope for no "Entfernungskonflikt". Thanks a lot! Beste groeten van Sängerby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Moin! Here we go again, now, that I've got the 3x3x3x3 on the road, and the 2x2x2x2 at the reviewers, I'll go for the 1x1x1x1. Same procedure as every year, here is my listing: 1 Cache from outside Germany 1x1 (1) Cache, that's not a traditional 1x1x1 (1) Cache, that's not a Micro 1x1x1x1 (1) Cache found per month in any year Is this possible? Thanks again, Sängby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Saenger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Should be fine now. > Thanks for your patience, > Sänger It was fine, the cache will be in the wild tomorrow 10:00 CET . Thanks again, I'll soon come around for a 1x1x1x1, and I'll give you a month or two for your work here. Beste Groeten van Sängerby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I just added this list to the cache-listing: Africa = Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania,by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The reviewer didn't like the continents, so I have to change something. I don't know why, as Groundspeak itself makes this distinctions in the statistics, in the Maps tab. I've rewritten the first criterium according to that to: 3 continents with at least one found cache as shown in the maps in statistics I hope that'll do it, otherwise I'll have to change it completby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Changed Thanks a lot!by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Worked like a charm, thank you very much! But! I was too stupid and forgot a letter: It's not a finds steak, but a finds streak, can you please change this error of mine </blush>by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
16 Regions in Europe would be fine, if that's not too hard to do. Edith says: Or at least all surrounding countries of Germany: Benelux, Denmark, Poland, Czechia, Austria, Switzerland and France.by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
But that's a bit hard for that challenge, it should be easier. No possibility to mix those two?by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is it because of the souvenirs, or because of the regions? I've seen challenges, where all 16 Länder from Germany, or all Landkreise from a certain Bundesland were required, so should I just formulate it in another way, or is the criterion completely off the table? Edith says: If I'd ask for 16 countries and/or Bundesländer, would that be fine? It's a challenge cache in Germanyby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Now I'm on the hook, the 3x3x3x3 is a wee bit too difficult to get lots of signatures, so I'm interested in a kind of series of challenges, the next one a bit less ambitious. It has again 4 criteria, here's the excerpt from the listing: QuoteMy Listing This is a Challenge-Cache, to log this cache, you have to fulfill all 2x2x2x2-requirements. The requirements are: 2 different cby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I agree with you that the output is messy but this > is the only multiple test checker where I can show > the continents So be it, at least the first line is useful ;) Let's see, what the reviewers will say to it.by Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In plaats van: Saenger hat "Project-GC Challenge Checker" verwendet, um zu prüfen, ob er/sie diese Challenge erfüllt und er/sie hat es geschafft. "1. 4 different container sizes with at least 4x4x4 (64) finds each" Qualifying 4 / 4, PASSED "2. 4x4 (16) Finds from differend years of hiding" Qualifying 22 / 16, PASSED "3. 4x4x4 (64) D/T-combinations found.&qby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works fine, at least I got a positive feedback, but the output is a wee bit strange. I'd like something short along the lines of my 4x4x4-checker. Probably something fishy with the syntax, but I don't have the faintest clue. This output of this one here is: Saenger hat "Project-GC Challenge Checker" verwendet, um zu prüfen, ob er/sie diese Challenge erfüllt und er/sie hatby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello again, I tried yesterday to get a 3x3x3x3 checker implemented, but failed, because I had the wrong criteria. I managend to get a 4x4x4 checker done, thanks for that, and as I said in my first request, I'd like to do one in my new homezone as well. And I finally managed to get 3x3x3x3 criteria, that fit a) my own caching history and b) the groundspeak criteria for challenges. Here theby Saenger - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)