Thanks for enlightening me. Apparently creativity is dead, everything has to be like what exists already, baloney and baloney alone. Too bad, this will not only be my last attempt for a challenge, I will also remove my existing ones. If it's baloney that Groundspeak wants, it's baloney they get.by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
There is no reference to the cache page elements mentioned there, no trackable log text is referred to and the information is readily available on GC.com If it is not allowed to use trackables in challenges, why are there such challenges around? I see some in Germany and in the U.S. by simply entering "challenge" and "TB" in a search. Just trying to understand.by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I searched with the keyword "lackey" but nothing came up. I would like to create a challenge for having logged 5 Lackey name badges and/or swapping cards. The trackable codes are all within the "GS" range. Is assume these are named ranges, so it would be feasible to use that named range for a checker. Thanks in advance, Merinoby Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Thanks, I had read the page on challenges criteria in the meantime. The reason I proposed the checker is that it was the first in the list when I looked for 'Belgium' AND '366'. With 366 days in a row, you always cover a full year, leap years included, so there was no need to think about streak vs calendar. I would like to use the 365 streak checker, thanks.by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
A bit lame that a leap year requirement is no longer allowed, but that raises a question: does this checker just skip Feb. 29 but verifies a log on all other dates of the year, OR does it check a stretch of 365 consecutive days with a log. In the first case you need to log every day from Jan 1st up and including Dec 31, thereby simply disregarding Feb. 29. In the second case you can start oby Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, I would like to get an instance of the existing checker Challenge: 366 days on a row (Belgium) for the GC code in subject, like https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC49D0V/409 Thanks in advance!by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looking good, thanks. Tested with 2 known positives and 1 known negative.by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, I have a challenge that requires having logged multiple events of different types of event. It can re-use the existing Multiple test Checker (by Target) I think that this tag should do the job: { "func": "and", "conf": [ { "func": "number", "conf": { "limit&by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Both versions yield a Dutch response, both in an account that has Dutch as user language and one that has English. Shouldn't be a problem though, most everyone who logs a challenge knows the format well enough to understand that the result is positive or negative. As long as the Latin alphabet is used anyway ;) Grtz, Erwinby Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Both a positive (Merino) and a negative (Spooky_Kitty) test were successful. Thanks! Erwinby Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Would someone please be so kind as to create the checker for this new challenge with DT Matrix Checker 81 (door E.U.S.A.L) and Tag { "minValue": 1, "pattern": [ [ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ] [ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, ] [ 1, 0, 0, 0,by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, For this new challenge I discussed with reviewer SatelliteSuzy if it was within the rules of GC. She confirmed that this is the case. An existing checker can be used: DT Matrix Checker 81 (door E.U.S.A.L) All that is missing is this Tag: { "minValue": 1, "pattern": [ [ 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 ] [ 0 1 0 1by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks, apparently another 'nono' with regard to challenges. This is becoming more restrictive every year, to the degree where people will say 'f*ck it' and skip placing challenges altogether. Very well then, this topic can be closed as I cannot be bothered anymore.by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Is there an existing checker that can be used for a subset of D/T combinations that is not linear, so no "all Dx" or "all Tx" or so, but rather by ad hoc list? Example: D1/T1 D1.5/T1______-_______-_______-_______-_______ D1.5/T3.5 D2/T1________-_______-_______-_______-_______D2/T3.5 D2.5/T1______-_______-_______-_______-_______ D2.5/T3.5 D3/T1________-___by Merino - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)