Good point :) Current solution is not accurate. I think that 1500 is a separate requirement not related to favorite calculations. Let's see if this solution 900+100 points is acceptable without modification.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7C97J/28675 Please, tell me when you've tested that it's okay.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I found that D/T changes may have broken some older qualifications and some have never been realized. Anyway, the FTF-finder and two others qualify as expected. Checker is here: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3QH75/28663 I hope you have some use for it. It was at least a pleasure to program. Please try it and tell if it meets expectations.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have the script almost ready, but there is some problems you should check with me. Automated testing found only two qualifying found logs. Is any of these eight not qualifying logs actually verified that the player passes the challenge? Quote Automatically test the profile names of the last 10 found logs on the challenge. Profile name Log date Result Log entry skyye53 2016-07-01 Not okby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
There is already "geochecker" for the mystery part. For me this request looks like a tool for checking something beyond the mystery part. Definitely this is not a challenge checker, but there are some other "not a challenge" checkers already. Anyway this mystery seems to work perfectly without any additional checker.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Checker does not need final coordinates. It could check that all listed caches are found, but there is no use for this kind of information, because the player only needs the final coordinates to find the cache and checker can not help with this matter. How did you think that the checker would be used?by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I fear that this will not work. It seems that your intention is to change the status of the cache to an official challenge, which is not allowed. If you publish the final coordinates, then everyone can find the cache without any limits.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Strombus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have just realized that one of my old caches is > actually a challenge cache, and I would love to > have it listed as such. In order to log this > cache, one has to find 25 designated caches in > Baranya county, Hungary. There are many expectations for a challenge cache. For example the title shoulby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I could try this if pieterix has something more important to do.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7C8DD/28654 Please let me know when you have accepted this for your challenge.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Competition rather than achievement is not allowed. Please check this guideline paragraph 2.12 position 14 for more informationby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Using the elevation this way may have some problems with guidelines. Criteria must come from information broadly available on Geocaching.com. ((td) No elevation in gc.com) Must be verifiable through information on Geocaching.com. ((td) You can't verify) Challenge criteria must be positive. ((td) Some elevations are negative) Anyway, the challenge is interesting and may be your reviewerby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! I grabbed your elevation data to Excel and made some calculations. You have 5534 items in the table and total elevation is 853 655 m. Your total differential elevation is 189 725 m. The script may be tagged currently for total calculations. There is also option for differential mode but it is not used - yet. Elevation is calculated as full meters so there is no significant roundingby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I think that there is no SI-prefixes in imperial system. (:P) Instead of "megafeet" you should consider using yards or miles.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I run a test checker and you pass. (I don't :X) Quote"13 different types" 2013-04-12 Austria Oberösterreich Linz GC1B6DP Unknown Cache Small 2013-04-16 Austria Oberösterreich Linz GC2956H KHG Linz Traditional Cache Small 2013-06-01 Austria Salzburg Salzburg GC2Y752 Geologie am Kapuzinerberg Earthcache Other 2013-07-10 Austria Oberösterreich Linz GC42PEW Lost Place Austria Tby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Not fast enough, I'll remove this tag :)-Dby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7C1MR/28566by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This checker is now ready and verified by the CO.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Additional question to the same topic: Do we have any public or secret guidelines for creating checker tags for "voluntary challenges" (non challenge with voluntary option to highlight statistics) and "tools" (not Tagged to a real challenge cache but may be used to check some statistics not available otherwise)?by arisoft - Miscellaneous
No need for a new script. My Multiple Test Script can handle this without modification. Checker is availabe here: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3YHA5/28517 During testing I found that Shae-Lynn did not qualify this challenge. (Last "Not chosen" GC5DTVK is actually "Other" type at this moment.) Output displays only Qualified dates. More detailed output is possiby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
> But I would restore all event types since you have > to be there and I assume that it was not them the > CO meant. Asking the CO might be a good idea CO allows using events so I put them back. Now this is ready.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
QuoteThe checker is also incorrect since virtual is include. My only US find is a virtual see the Quote. With the physically signed the caches yourself would also exclude earth caches and webcams. And if you are extreme evens since singing event logs are not a requirement. There is a bookmark list for traveling caches that can be used. An the Master of the Universe owner and the specified GC codeby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
QuoteTarget I would be surprised it that will be allowed to publish a similar today as you indicated The given request seems to be not compatible with the actual challenge. I must add missing requirements.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BTTK/28477by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I see, there is no numeric limit at all. I will disable the Tag now and wait for comment from tkbär73.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I rechecked the 05-14 and you have found 203 caches at that calendar day, so it was not an error. You have 9 qualifying days. I also added the list on the log output. Quote(https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=fcbdos) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCZZZZZ/28385 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did. "8 daysby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
There is an error at 05-14, It should not pass and need a fix. vogelbird may be concerned about those visible dates witch are somehow misleading although real for those listed example caches.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can not find any specific guideline for this case. I know that there are many secret guidelines for reviewers only. Maybe this is one? Do we have any reference for maximum allowed limit?by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
OK. I have a checker ready for you, but before you can use it, I need the GC-CODE of your challenge. Quote"8 days with more than 200 founds" 2017-05-06 GC6A4FA PTH#188 2017-05-08 GC6AEK5 PTH#595 2017-05-09 GC6ACTM PTH#822 2017-05-10 GC6AN71 PTH#1029 2017-05-12 GC6AYAT PTH#1442 2017-05-13 GC6B3C5 PTH#1679 2017-05-14 GC6BF5E PTH#1947 2017-05-15 GC6BHHF PTH#2142 2017-05-16 GC6Bby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Maximum allowed is one cache per day. 200 is just too high per one day. Do you mean total cumulative number of caches in a single day of year?by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)