Checker is here https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC1VE0E/28899 It is now using the same state rule for virtuals and earth caches. I think that there is no problems if some distance is used instead. Please, try it.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
County is one option (smallest know area). Distance calculations are time consuming but possible.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Siamese Retriever Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 6. Virtual and Earth caches will only count if you > have a traditional (requiring log) in the same > area within the same time frame of 1 or 2 days. > (This is probably the hardest part to figure - > would it make the program easier to just exclude > virtuals and earthcaches? Or could thby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I am sorry, but according the guidelines, specific list of caches is not allowed. QuoteParagraph 11 A challenge based on elements under the cache owner’s primary control is not acceptable: examples, my favorites, my caches, bookmark lists, caches by this owner, or this group.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Addind detailed output needed some new options to the script. Now qualifying caches are also displayed.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
True! Wrong filter field was in use. Now testing shows green for all logged finds.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
"minHiddenDate" is just the reason why some Founds does not actually qualify.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The script is still under some development. That is why there is no visible documentation yet. I am looking for better output for the sample LOG as there is no details. Only HTML list possible dates.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No need for new script. "Easy to tag" (:P) Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC1ANWK/28888 During testing I found couple of not Qualifying found logs.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CN3V/28882 Please, tell us when you've accepted it.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Quoteganja1447 After some analyzing I realized that it was due to returning a huge list of HTML. It took ~100 times more CPU power to handle the HTML output than to validate the user. Handling (purifying) of the HTML can happen only after the script has returned the html string in the very end of the process. If the returned string is too long, it could be stored temporarily and processed lateby arisoft - Checker news
Using that list the result changes: Quote"One cache of 100+ favorite points in seven different states" Oregon: GC2VMVW The Adventures of Sock Monkey (Traditional Cache) ♥244 Washington: GC26ZJD Twenty 5 "oh" one (Traditional Cache) ♥241 Louisiana: GCA560 Survivors Park:New Orleans (Virtual Cache) ♥139 Oklahoma: GC7051 "And Jesus Wept" (Virtual Cache) ♥340 Hawby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes. You could give a list of allowed cache types to get rid of them.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I sligthly tuned the output byt using hearts for favorites. Quote"One cache of 100+ favorite points in seven different states" Oregon: GC2VMVW The Adventures of Sock Monkey (Traditional Cache) ♥244 Washington: GC26ZJD Twenty 5 "oh" one (Traditional Cache) ♥241 Louisiana: GCA560 Survivors Park:New Orleans (Virtual Cache) ♥139 Oklahoma: GC7051 "And Jesus Wept" (by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CM58/28863by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7C8V3/28858 Please test and let us know.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
> Did i understand you correctly that i have to pick > out the dimond Bagdegens that i would like to have > for my challenge, (without the writing one for > example)? And it might be doable? If you make a list of badges and document one by one how they are earned, there should be no problems with the source of criteria. This same documentation is needed for writing the checker.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
QuoteThe ultimate goal in my opinion is that all scripts/tags should output usable log examples and script output that is worth looking at. The HTML output is additional information like debug output. In most cases it is not needed at all until there is some reason to check details. You could automatically hide every too long HTML until the user clicks the "show" button to see it. Thiby arisoft - Checker news
BadgeGens are not easy way as challenge cache criteria must come from information broadly available on Geocaching.com and must be verifiable through information on Geocaching.com. Some Badges may also use disallowed criteria. For example "The Author" is based on average found log word count which is not allowed source. You may succeed if you list all allowed badges for your challengeby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This checker includes your owned mysteries to the total https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BWVE/28853 I suspect that there might be difficulties to get this accepted because owned caches are not listed as allowed source of criteria. It depends on the interpretation as the challenge does not require to own any caches. And you have to qualify yourself before you will get this published.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a different checker that you pass yourself. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CHCA/28814 Please, tell us which version you are going to use.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You are right. This "optimization" alters the requirement. Reverting to the first one.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This requirement may violate the "Find date" guideline "Restrictions on date of finds used for the challenge are not permitted.". This is very subjective guideline but I have got challenge rejection for this reason for specific days of year. Anyway, the problem with this kind of requirement is the demand for "Positive Challenge Criteria". Your design punishes geocby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Quote(https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=Siamese%20Retriever) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3E5V6/28777 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did. "9 traditional caches that have been found by at least 1000 other cachers" Qualifying 13 / 9, PASSED "1 non traditional cache that have been found by atby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker for you https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CC18/28778 Please, give feedback on whether this is suitable for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Quote(https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=Siamese%20Retriever) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3E5V6/28777 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did. "1 cache that have been found by at least 2000 other cachers" Qualifying 11 / 1, PASSED "9 traditional caches that have been found by at least 1000 otherby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I found today that a script I was testing did not show full length output. Html part was cut in the middle. Same output was full lenght few days ago.by arisoft - Miscellaneous
Comment is now updated.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Now it is limited to Poland only.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Fixed now. The least favorited, 100 or more points collected cache, is now excluded from the total.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)