Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E4C2/29964 For some reason the checker finds more than 1772 caches for you. Please tell us whether this is suitable for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, this seems to be time limited challenge because you have to find specific number of caches in one month. Current guideline for challenges does not allow this kind of criteria. QuoteNot acceptable: Time-limited caching: as in some number of finds per day, week, month, or year. Example, Busy Day, 50 finds in a day, 500 finds in a month, etc.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC51KR8/29956 Please tell us wether it is suitable for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7EDCN/29920 Please, let us know if it is suitable for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
However... for new challenges challenge cache may be disabled or archived if the associated challenge checker does not work properly. Challenge checker requirements: - The challenge checker must verify that a player does or does not qualify to log a challenge cache as found. There is no option for "no answer" :(by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Requiring cachers to own a cache is not allowed. Challenge cache criteria must be based upon caches with the seeker’s logs: Found it!, Attended, Webcam Photo Taken.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
GC1ZFYN - Iowa Well Rounded Cacher https://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,14034 is somehow similar combination solving problem. Do you think that your idea could always find the solution in allowed time limit?by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Actual stipulations were more complicated than I thought. It is likely that checker can not find solution in allowed time (30 seconds) as there are so many combinations to try. Maybe, with some sophisticated algorithm this could be done in the allowed time window.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Stipulations on cache description seems to be different as requested. I have to hand over as you are not the cache owner.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I have made a similar to GC2CKEY - The Finnish Well Rounded Cacher Challenge. Your stipulations are somehow different but it can be arranged. Your local reviewer may ask you to demonstrate that there are plenty of qualifying caches to meet the challenge at the time of publication. APE caches may also be a problem. Have you already asked a local reviewer's opinion? Anyway I am workingby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7EHT4/29761 Please, tell us wether it is suitable for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I made a simple new checker for testing. Please try this: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC76T1P/29668by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
> However, one of these had exactly 25 according to > my counting. There may be a double logging that I > did not find, but I want to check this out. Could > it be that the checker requires 25 in addition to > the one that requires T5? If so, I hope you can > adjust that, simply because this may cause some > unnecessary frustration. Tests are separate. You should seeby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E02F/29642 Please, tell us wether it is suitable for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I think that municipality is exactly the same as county which is allowed criteria. But seems to depend on country as I can not find these from the database.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here is the third one option with different output style: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7DZE5/29575by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E18E/29554 Please tell us whether is right for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
"Groundspeak Lost and Found Celebration" now added with 250 points.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the same checker for your new GC-code: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E1H5/29514 Please, tell us whether is what you need.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is now changed to 3.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker is here for testing: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7DYGR/29507 It shows that you do not qualify yourself. Is there something missing? Maybe "Mega event = 10 points" should be "Mega event = 100 points" ? Event Cache, 53 × 1 = 53 points Cache In Trash Out Event, 12 × 2 = 24 points Mega-Event Cache, 3 × 10 = 30 points Total 107 points of 500 requireby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This checker gives you the correct result: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E0TB/29505 Please tell us which checker you are going to use. Quote(https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=The%20Blue%20Quasar) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E0TB/29505 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did. Event Cache, 183 × 1by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
"you must find a series of Traditional caches at increasing distances from the next closest cache" At first glance this seems to be impossible, because it needs ability to search nearest caches and there is no such tool available in the scipting system. Any ideas?by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7D5XW/29332 Vogelbird's checker is better. I remove this tag.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CVZW/29329 Please tell me if it's okay for you.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have changed the setup and you can now try it again.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I tagged your 1 x 100 challenge here: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CQKF/29325 There may be some limits how many countries your local reviewer will accept. Checkers are possible, of course, after you have the GC-code.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC7D8JQ_united-states-time-zone-challenge-of-rockford This cache is unpublished. That is why you see red text "Cache does not exist". Don't worry about that. It will be fixed after your cache is published.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Groundspeak's opinion is that because of this a > timezone checker == a polygon checker. Hense the > situation that you have to define the States > versus Zone Yes... this is the vague part. Sometimes polygons are ok and sometimes thay are not and sometimes the information is filtered by the reviewby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
DelicateFlower & Tim Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Reviewer Smith and his peers decided it was not > acceptable because of this rule. > > Not acceptable: Challenges based on geographic > areas other than countries, states/provinces, > counties, (or their local equivalent. For > example, user-defined mapping polygons, > laby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)