Fails when running for me as well. :6477: attempt to concatenate global 'owner_name' (a nil value)by olalb - Checker requests
So, should be fixed. The people I tested on had a bit more data so I missed a tablecheck.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Not expected. I'll check it tonight (or tomorrow) when I get home.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAC3H7/79909 Not much of an output when you don't qualify, but a bit too many variables to make something pretty when there's a good breakdown in the PGC-stats.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3YR5H/73931by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
1. Added some minor output. 2. Seems pointless to show more than the required (it shows the configurable required, not always 3). Added it for script output, but kept log output at the required number so there isn't a wall of text for those that have traveled a lot. 3. Sorting function returned bad data (didn't cast to int), should be fixed now.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It checks rows/columns first, so diagonals are only checked if there's no row/column. I sidestepped that in the code and checked two users that had diagonal and that worked. So you must either find someone that does not qualify for row/column, or I have to (easily) modify the script to check diagonals anyway (it doesn't output row/column then, only diagonals).by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9VW4D/70496 Overall the code isn't very good, but as far as I can tell it works and I just cba refactoring it. I've tested it with two people with >100k finds (and a bunch of others). But might be some bug under certain situations, never know.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm working on this. I have row/column cross done, just need to refactor so I can also check diagonals and fix output for diagonal and when the user doesn't qualify. Might be done today, depending on how well/badly the refactoring goes.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9Q7EE/70402by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9XA5N/70322by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker fixed (I hope).by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If it doesn't find any matching month, it will output latest (which is what you're experiencing). If it does find a matching month, it will say which (try any of the last 10 finders). If it isn't finding a match, then it's a bug and I need the username (and month for faster debugging) so I can check.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Project-GC has access to home coordinates, the checker API does not (and no, they're not the same). So even if the reference is 4 years "old", it's still correct when it comes to this. And as vogelbird said, if you think the interpretation is wrong (or if you think a screenshot should qualify) bring it up with your local reviewer as we're not reviewers.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC36YDZ/57567 Labcaches are included since several finders have used their official statistics and those include labcaches.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC26RG4/55573by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
GC2E14D https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2E14D/54827 AddHam (FTF:er) no longer qualifies, probably because GCY848 changed D/T (it's 2/3 now). Took me a while to track that down, thought I had a bug and kept looking in the wrong place for it. May be some bugs, hard to really verify since only two people have logged. I had intended to do GC4CAEC as well, but it requires distancby olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Now the api works as intended. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8YJGW/53946 I don't know any usernames that qualify so I can't make sure so you have to test it out some and see if it's correct.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Do these new functions actually work? See https://project-gc.com/forum/read?4,42956by olalb - Method requests
Trying to use GetHighestCaches and I'm only getting a blank exception (empty error log). Tried GetLowestCaches() with the same result. Also tried various parameters, same result. When I use GetOldestCaches (which if I understand correctly should work the same) it works just fine. Are the functions bugged, or am I just missing something? The checker I'm working on: https://proby olalb - Script development
Yes. I've prepared a script, but I'm getting errors from the PGC api. Trying to find out if something is wrong in the api or if I'm just using it wrong. Will post again once it's ready for use.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Done.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC38ZCQ/53449 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC38ZCR/53459 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC38ZCT/53458 People that used the old owner for adopted caches (like yourself for the 15 and WanderingExplorer for the 25) will be flagged as not qualified any more, since it uses owner_id to check owner and only know about the current one. All 3 works for fisby olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ran into an odd problem when listing userfinds by oldest first. User: MindlessEngine local userFinds = PGC.GetFinds(profileId, { fields = { 'gccode', 'type', 'size', 'owner_id', 'cache_name', 'visitdate', 'country', 'region', 'county', 'difficulty', 'terrain' }, filter = filter, Oby olalb - Script development
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC58KB5/53031 However, due to the complexity of the requirements may produce false negatives. That complexity also makes it hard to present users with a "You lack X to quality", so I'm not going to do that. The code is also quite bad, as I just cba to make a better version (a crapload of more or less duplicate code). It uses the bookmarklisby olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8T159/51796 Check and verify that I didn't make a mistake.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8T187/51793 Check and verify I've not made a mistake.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5HT0V/51652by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8PCG1/51606 I've tested with various users where it all worked as expected, but never know if I've covered all circumstances.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)