Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HBE2/47621 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HBBZ/47620 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The cache owner needs to copy this html code into their listing: <a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2EZEM/47603"><img src="https://cdn2.project-gc.com/Images/Checker/47603" title="Project-GC Challenge checker" alt="PGC Checker"></a> You can also find it on the checker page when you click on the "Link..." button onby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I wanted to look at the code in detail a bit, but it is kinda hard to make sense of it since the debug output does not work at the places where I'm not sure what it does. But I think it already does always try the DT combination with the least possible attributes first. I have written a small script that transforms the problem into another format for a given user, which I then checked locby PattuX - Miscellaneous
I suspect this is not easily doable. First of all, more finds do not make this problem harder necessarily. As finding one solution is enough, someone with many finds may qualify in millions of different ways and just randomly picking some cache for any cell may be good enough to arrive at a solution. Xnard seems to be in a spot where determining whether there is a solution is really hard sinceby PattuX - Miscellaneous
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HAQ8/47600 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hm, I don't see that stat on my profile page, but perhaps it's a new feature that's only visible for premium users yet. Anyway, I have a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HAPM/47597 However it shows you qualifying at 2.55 million feet rather than 400k. Also your profile page shows an average elevation of 360m which at 2164 finds actually gives a total eby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HAN2/47596 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HAB1/47592 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, the list should be shown now. Again, same link.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
My bad, I misread. I've changed it, the link is still the same.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H9AV/47559 Let us know if it's suitableby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
QuoteI would advise you not to name it a jasmer challenge because you are just asking for 5 caches published in the year 2000 I disagree since they've added this rule recently: QuoteNot acceptable: Restricting finds to caches published prior to a particular date. (added Nov 2019) but at the same time added QuoteAcceptable: Jasmer challenges and variations. (added Nov 2019) So calby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here's an alternative checker (positive and negative) if you prefer the matrix output: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H5ER/47544 Let us know which one you prefer.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
The checker script seems to be disabled.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, I've changed the checker. Let me know if it works as expected. Thanks, merry christmas to you, too!by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Der Sinn hinter der Regel (und Groundspeaks gesamter Philosophie) ist, dass die Kriterien, an denen Challenges gemessen werden, etwas aus den von GS angezeigten Eigenschaften einer Dose, wie D/T-Wertung, Typ oder Land, ist. Alles was diese Serie als Serie ausmacht sind die Namen (was auch kein zulässiges Kriterium wäre) und die Lesezeichenlisten auf denen die Caches gespeichert sind (auch nicht zby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Solche Challenges sind generell nicht zulässig, siehe Regel 11 der Guidelines, Bestimmte Listen: QuoteNicht Zulässig: Eine Herausforderung basierend auf Elementen, die primär der Kontrolle des Cache-Owners unterliegen ist nicht freischaltbar. Beispiele: Meine Favoriten, Meine Caches, Lesezeichenlisten, Caches eines oder mehrerer bestimmter Cache-Owner.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H202/47518 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, no problem. I've changed it to only Tradi, Multi, Mystery, Wherigo and Letterbox now. Link is still the same.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC81KBZ/47507 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is unfortunately not possible with the current guidelines as per rule 9 since you require more than one find on a date: QuoteNot acceptable: Requiring more than one find on any day or calendar date, even if cumulative.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
May has a typo, currently it's "min":5 instead of two. Also small typo in the name of February. n0w0rries - You still don't qualify tho.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
1) to 3) should be fine. 4) is requiring finds from a certain owner is not in line with the guidelines. Please check them for details on what is an acceptable criteria and what is not, in particular rule 10. Groundspeak also specifically states that: QuoteChallenge caches published after April 21, 2015, must include a link to a Project-GC challenge checker. So I suspect your reviewer willby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H0VM/47350 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ok, then I misunderstood. Changed it to kommuner and now you do qualify.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I updated the checker. Link is still the same. But it seems you still do not qualify, as you only have 6 different qualifying regions. Just to be clear, by "county" I assume you still mean "fylke"? It's a little confusing since the oifficial translation of fylke is county while PGC uses county as a general term for the second level of administration (i.e. one levelby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I was just about to start writing the script when I realized this can be done with an existing script. We had a similar request just a few days ago. It slightly rephrases the requirements like this: M 13 Mystery finds in 4 fylker in Norway Y 25 Mystery finds in a fylke in Norway S 19 Mystery finds in 3 fylker in Norway T 20 Mystery finds in 2 fylker in Norway but allows using the sameby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I was thinking about the APE cache requirement as a type restriction, i.e. "Find an APE cache in the US" Guidelinewise there should be nothing stopping you from combining a souvenir checker with a "find a cache of type X in country Y" checker, albeit the type in this case would be rather special.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
There is also the "Original Cache Location" souvenir given out for finding the original stash which may be a valid criterion.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)