Try using me as a test case. You get a different response. I may have mentioned before once it finds a reason to stop it does. That is in the works.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Howdy, There is now some feedback on what cache types need more D/T grid points. The code dealing with the find a solution is gone. The colorful grid still remains to be done.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Country filters should now be implemented and work. One of my US test cases now fails. Feedback appreciated.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
AnnaMoritz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The checker looks fine so far, thank you very > much, but I would like to restrict eligible caches > to Europe (Europe would in fact be provided as a > list of countries) if possible. Could you widen > the possible tags be able to restrict finds to a > country/list of countries like in other scripby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Carnatic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > now it works :). I am considering to use this > instead of "mine"... Carnatic Please discuss that in your thread.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It sounds as thought I need to make the script more flexibleby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Try nowby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That would be a bug.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Just as an fyi, the models to approximate not home country can have some unexpected behaviours. These occur particularly when the cacher lives somewhere with few caches. A cacher from Taipei might easily have half their finds in the US or the less strict most as well. Caching near las vegas can have big weekends. Another approach some have used is to exclude the country the challenge is in.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The Anna checker is online in her thread now. You can work with it there.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC74HBP/26131 Let me know how it works. You give great bug reports so I am looking forward to it.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Carnatic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi sloth96, > > can you provide a link to this 100 Favo Checker > here? I would like to try whether I meet this > limit as well. Thanks! You qualify. With the 100 favorite points./ events means only events requirement No I do not want to post the second checker here to eliminate confusion. We aby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Anna When you put in the request, the checker is waiting for you.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Carnatic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ...I know that these are not all, but these are > all those required for my challenge. ;) Reasonable response. I will try to have that in the markup log as well. Unless we can't embed images any more.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Carnatic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Sloth96, > > thanks again for taking and completing this task! > I have two questions regarding comments in the > source code of the checker. What is the background > of this output: "You completed the challenge but > the checker could not find a grid that qualified. > However it diby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
take as much time as you like. You have been very patient.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
AnnaMoritz, Can you please file a new request so this one can be about Carnatic's request? Also there will need to be a GC code in that request do build the checker. Everything you are asking for is reasonable and feasible. Thanks for your help in generating test cases. Carnatic, Unless you have more comments, good luck with the reviewers. Please post to let us know if you considerby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Folks, Please kick the tires on http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6K5EQ/26080 It processes things on the basis of category rather than d/t bin. This is the refactoring I was talking about. The code still needs some cleaning to make it more readable. But it appears to work As for AnnaMoritz's request, I need to make the interface a bit more general to support your favorite point thby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In the future you might want to just post another message with the change instead of editing the original one. That would send an email to other participants in the thread.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Can you please provide a GC for your new cache?by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks for the other test case. Refactoring the code to search by category and not by dt grid point is on the list. That is basically what Anna Moritz is doing.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
As a heads up, I will be disabling the script to fix the issue that AnnaMoritz highlighted. Thanks very much for the feedback.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Anna, Nice example on how my assertion is not correct. And nice graphics. The check is necessary but not sufficient. It sounds like time to get back to the drawing board and add a better check. Clearly a check of all of them pairwise needs to be added. The question is does the code need to go through all subsets of all sizes. Although, that should be rather quick, there are only 512 orby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Actually the behavior of the script is more interesting than simply denying that you completed the challenge. It is more along the lines of agreeing you completed it and then it does not find your particular matrix in the allowed amount of time. The test for whether you qualify or not is actually closely related to your coloring approach. If the category with the least number of dt bins filleby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Please kick the tires on http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6K5EQ/25949 It turned out that the computationally painful cachers were the ones where someone had not qualified. A couple of heuristics up front to filter them out and the runtime became reasonable. Any comments appreciated.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Carnatic, Do you have your list of people who qualify ready? I would like to do some testing. Thanks.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I believe it can be altered. I just need to divide the list and run two checks. A couple of hours sound like much work.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This cache is published at this time. see here. This can probably be marked completed.by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Howdy, Independent of target's effort, I have made an attempt at writing a checker for this. Like target my approach is getting bogged down in the computation. It can handle a small chunk of the fizzy tile but once it gets too big it just keeps spinning. For those interested in how I am doing it, I am using a recursive search that prunes paths when a category has 9 (d,t) bins that areby sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Are we good with this one?by sloth96 - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)