The checker works great for both positive and negative tests. Thanks for building this checker.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for helping me get things in order. Ok, let's see if I can get my ducks in a row. The NEW challenge for GC9TJ1R is to find at least 1 geocache in any county, 2 in another, so on and finally a county with at least 20 finds. Any type of geocache counts. I have done this for up to 33 counties.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Apologies for not checking and replying. The checker works great for both positive and negative tests. Thank you.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Jpavlik is one busy chap. I'll change the challenge so it can make the deadline. The new challenge for GC9TJ1R is to find at least 1 geocache in any state, 2 in another, so on and finally a state with at least 5 finds. Any type of geocache counts.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Corectamundo. That works perfectly! Thank you very much.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker works great for both positive and negative tests. I like how it shows more than just the required 5 types if you happen to have them. Nice touch. Cheers Boss!by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker functioned well but it looks like the height was set to 5000' instead of 6000'.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Another checker in the bag perfect and polished. Both positive and negative tests were successful. Thank you for the help! Also, thank you to all the people in the background that laid the foundation for these little victories. Best, CheekyBrit.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker worked great for both positive and negative tests. That is fascinating reading through other people's results and seeing which high places friends have explored. Thank you very much!by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker for GC9TJ17 (10 CITOs) worked a treat. That is cool you can make adjustments while keeping the link the same. Well played. I followed the link you mentioned (https://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,62079,62079#msg-62079) and everything looks good there too. Everything should be resolved. THANKS! CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Apologies I let this one slip through the cracks. The checker works great for positive and negative tests. Nice touch showing all qualifying states AND more than just the 5 required types if there are some. That is pretty cool for using this checker for personal challenges above and beyond the 5 types in 5 states requirements. Even if someone doesn't pass, it shows their progress. NICE! Gby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker worked a treat. Both positive and negative tests were successful. Many thanks, CheekyBrit.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Another challenge checker working perfectly. Positive and negative tests were successful and that calendar chart is sweet. Thank you! Best, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker worked for both positive and negative tests. It never gets old seeing these sweet graphical representations of data. Thank you very much. CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker works a treat and the calendar chart is amazing as always. It is so so much easier than the method I was using exporting to excel and parsing the data manually. I realize I made a mistake and actually haven't completed this challenge yet. I will before I publish. THANKS!by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hallo. The challenge for GC9TJ1R is to Find a pair of geocaches with an elevation difference of at least 3000' in three different counties. That is 914 meters for those who are metrically minded. The counties used can be anywhere, as long as both geocaches used for each pair are in the same county. Thank you for the help. These 44 challenge caches are going to be part of something preby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hallo. The challenge for 9TJ1N is to find 5 different type of geocache at or above 5000 feet. That is 1829 meters for the metrically inclined. Thank you for your challenge checker building volunteering. You help keep the geocaching world turning. Best, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hallo. The challenge for GC9TJ1J is to find Find 10 geocaches at or above 6000 feet, each hidden in a different year. Thank you for the help building all of these challenge checkers. Best, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hallo. The challenge for GC9TJ1H is to find all 7 sizes of geocache at or above 5000 feet of elevation. That is 1524 meters if your mind operates on metric. Many thanks for your continued help. Best, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hallo. The challenge for GC9TJ1F is to find a geocache at 8000 feet or higher in at least 3 counties. Thank you very much for the help.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hallo. The challenge for GC9TJ1E is to find at least 10 unknown caches that form a sequential string on the date hidden chart. It is just like GC9TJ19 and the calendar chart in that one's checker was brilliant. Please do that for this one too please. Best, CheekyBrit.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello. The challenge for GC9TJ1C is to find at least 30 traditional caches that form a sequential string on the date hidden chart. This is similar to GC9TJ19 and I would be very grateful if you included a calendar chart in this one too. Please and thank you. Best, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello. The challenge for GC9TJ1B is to find at least 10 regular size caches that form a sequential string on the date hidden chart. It is similar to GC9TJ19 and the calendar chart output on that checker was fantastic. If possible, please do the same for this checker. Many thanks. CheekyBrit.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello. The challenge for GC9TJ1A is to find at least 10 small size caches that form a sequential string on the date hidden chart. This is similar to GC9TJ19. The calendar chart output was fantastic. Please do it again. Thanks for the help. Forget Rappers delight ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKTUAESacQM ), that'd be a geocacher's delight. I said-a hip, hop, the cacher,by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker worked for both positive and negative tests. I noticed it didn't provide any of the GC codes as proof but it shouldn't be an issue. If anyone wants to see, it is easy enough to pull up a list of CITOs from their geocaching profile page under 'finds', ordered by type. Thanks for the help!by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yet another brilliant checker. It works for both positive and negative tests and results in a beautiful calendar chart. Great stuff. This is a goal I have been working toward, filling my hidden chart for each size and type separately and this checker's chart output will be fantastic for figuring what I need to do more. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello and welcome to this pocket of hidden sequence challenges. This challenge and the other four coming soon similar to it are all comparable to GC9QD1X "10 Sequential hidden Placed Date Multi challenge" As proof of concept, it was published and is happily up and running. The challenge for GC9TJ19 is to find at least 15 micro size caches that form a sequential string on the dateby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello. The challenge for GC9TJ17 is to attend 10 CITO events. Boom, done. Possibly the easiest challenge checker I've requested. Thanks!by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker works great for both positive and negative tests. It is a nice touch to show the progress someone has made if they don't yet qualify. Nice touch. Thanks for the help!by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker works great for both positive and negative tests. Thanks for the help!by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)