×

To be able to write in the forum you need to authenticate. Meanwhile it's read-only.

Change History

Once a checker request has been fulfilled and the challenge owner (or checker requester) is satisfied the thread should be moved here by a moderator. Please allow some time before moving the thread, to allow feedback from the requester.

Message: Re: Requesting another checker (for GCA4QC6)

Changed By: DrAcorn
Change Date: March 15, 2023 07:15PM

Re: Requesting another checker (for GCA4QC6)
I think I have a solution for this one. I've made it so that the attributes appear on the side of the grid instead of the centre, hence greatly reducing the size of HTML. I've tested it with some of the most prolific cachers in the world and they all run fine.

From my point of view, this is a lot easier than extending the other GC9P0GZ script for this cache, and it would result in being quite a big fork from what it is intended for. the other cache would be fine to extend the GC9P0GZ script for, so let me know if you want the D/T/Attribute cache to be from the GC9P0GZ script or the same format as the other (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA4QC6/75761)

I've also now excluded all events too (didn't read the request properly!)

Also about the two threads, we can mark the other one (https://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,71373) as resolved I think, then continue with this one.
Changed By: DrAcorn
Change Date: March 15, 2023 07:15PM

Re: Requesting another checker (for GCA4QC6)
I think I have a solution for this one. I've made it so that the attributes appear on the side of the grid instead of the centre, hence greatly reducing the size of HTML. I've tested it with some of the most prolific cachers in the world and they all run fine.

From my point of view, this is a lot easier than extending the other GC9P0GZ script for this cache, and it would result in being quite a big fork from what it is intended for. the other cache would be fine to extend the GC9P0GZ script for, so let me know if you want the D/T/Attribute cache to be from the GC9P0GZ script or the same format as the other (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA4QC6/75761)

I've also now excluded all events too (didn't read the request properly!)

Also about the two threads, we can mark the other one as resolved I think, then continue with this one.

Original Message

Author: DrAcorn
Date: March 15, 2023 07:12PM

Re: Requesting another checker (for GCA4QC6)
I think I have a solution for this one. I've made it so that the attributes appear on the side of the grid instead of the centre, hence greatly reducing the size of HTML. I've tested it with some of the most prolific cachers in the world and they all run fine.

From my point of view, this is a lot easier than extending the other GC9P0GZ script for this cache, and it would result in being quite a big fork from what it is intended for. the other cache would be fine to extend the GC9P0GZ script for, so let me know if you want the D/T/Attribute cache to be from the GC9P0GZ script or the same format as the other (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA4QC6/75761)