×

To be able to write in the forum you need to authenticate. Meanwhile it's read-only.

[Resolved] GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge

[Resolved] GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 24, 2017 11:53AM
Hi.
Thanks again for creating the checker. May I ask for a little change?
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CCZK/28746
https://project-gc.com/forum/read?11,12718
At the moment, the checker is set so that the values must be exactly as in the following example (screenshot). I wish the following change:
The smallest minimum value should be "10" in an any bar of the diagram.
The next minimum value should be "20" in an any bar of the diagram. ...etc...
The largest minimum value should be "210" in an any bar of the diagram. (because the diagram consists of 21 bars)
I hope this is possible and thank you in advance.
Best regards
Robby
https://s3.amazonaws.com/gs-geo-images/baee905d-9e31-4d80-b5c1-e01af4696bb1_l.jpg
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 24, 2017 06:28PM
What your asking this time is not possible with this script and there is currently no alternative for this question.
The omly thing I can do is marking this topic as a new script required
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 24, 2017 10:28PM
Do I understand this correctly?

21 different tests and all must pass.

The first is 10 to 19 meters
The second is 20 to 29 meters
etc...
And the last is 210 meters or more.

At every level there is some arbitrary number of finds needed to pass.
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 25, 2017 12:33AM
The old checker is an example for a situation https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CCZK/28746 of a cacher
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 25, 2017 06:47AM
In the statistics at project-gc there is a height diagram with 21 "beams".
(<0m, 0-25m, 25-50m, 50-75m, 75-100m, 100-125m, 125-150m, 150-200m, 200-250m, 250-300m, 300-400m, 400-500m, 500- 600m, 600-750m, 750-1000m, 1000-1250m, 1250-1500m, 1500-1750m, 1750-2000m, 2000-2500m, 2500-5000m) The checker shall test the following: The minimum value of finds must be at least "10" - no matter which "beam". The next higher value of finds must be at least "20" - no matter which "beam". ... etc ... Consequently, the highest value must be at least 210 because there are 21 "beams". (See screenshot in my last post.)
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 25, 2017 09:12AM
OK... this is possible to do. Wait a moment...
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 25, 2017 10:11AM
Now you can try this checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CCZK/28923

Quote

[-Kobold-](https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=-Kobold-) has used [Project-GC](https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CCZK/28923 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did.

Elevation 2500 - 5000 m, Needed 10, Finds 16, PASSED
Elevation 1750 - 2000 m, Needed 20, Finds 23, PASSED
Elevation 2000 - 2500 m, Needed 30, Finds 42, PASSED
Elevation 1500 - 1750 m, Needed 40, Finds 49, PASSED
Elevation - 0 m, Needed 50, Finds 66, PASSED
Elevation 1250 - 1500 m, Needed 60, Finds 75, PASSED
Elevation 50 - 75 m, Needed 70, Finds 83, PASSED
Elevation 1000 - 1250 m, Needed 80, Finds 141, PASSED
Elevation 75 - 100 m, Needed 90, Finds 146, PASSED
Elevation 25 - 50 m, Needed 100, Finds 147, PASSED
Elevation 750 - 1000 m, Needed 110, Finds 151, PASSED
Elevation 500 - 600 m, Needed 120, Finds 234, PASSED
Elevation 600 - 750 m, Needed 130, Finds 289, PASSED
Elevation 125 - 150 m, Needed 140, Finds 344, PASSED
Elevation 0 - 25 m, Needed 150, Finds 385, PASSED
Elevation 400 - 500 m, Needed 160, Finds 504, PASSED
Elevation 150 - 200 m, Needed 170, Finds 636, PASSED
Elevation 250 - 300 m, Needed 180, Finds 733, PASSED
Elevation 200 - 250 m, Needed 190, Finds 802, PASSED
Elevation 100 - 125 m, Needed 200, Finds 831, PASSED
Elevation 300 - 400 m, Needed 210, Finds 891, PASSED
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 25, 2017 10:19AM
Nice work , I have removed the old checker
Re: GC7CCZK - Elevation-Chart-Challenge
September 25, 2017 04:13PM
Great!!! :-)
That's exactly how I imagined it.
Many thanks to you and many greetings from Dresden / Germany.
Robby
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login