×

To be able to write in the forum you need to authenticate. Meanwhile it's read-only.

[Resolved] requesting checker for GC5QM86

[Resolved] requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 08, 2023 09:01PM
Please can a checker be created for GC5QM86 Explorer 302 Challenge (Northallerton & Thirsk)

This is the same principle as the existing checker for GC5JFNQ Explorer 300 Challenge, but has a different map area and requires a minimum of 127 squares to be found (rather than the 110 squares.

I have qualified - at the time of publication of the cache I had 148 squares.

Many thanks

Sowerby
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 08, 2023 09:47PM
It will take some time for us to do since we will need to convert all the UTM coordinates to latitude and longitude and then build the polygons.

I will look into it later tonight if vogelbird doesn’t beat me to it.
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 09, 2023 07:32AM
Thank you. There are a number of other Explorer Challenges that alreday have challenge checkers if that helps, including
https://coord.info/GC4KFEW
https://coord.info/GC3CW70
https://coord.info/GC3HEC6
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 09, 2023 02:28AM
Okay, this is more difficult than I thought because datum conversions. This will take some time. I want to write a generic script that could apply to any of this OSGB map grid challenges.
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 09, 2023 02:03PM
I started a script based on the GSAK macro (some of these explorer challenges are old requests that I was trying to clear out). It works now minus the OSGB datum conversion... Apparently GSAK had that conversion internal. I had some JS code that does.it, but when I converted it to Lua, it didn't work anymore... And I haven't come back to figure out why yet.
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 09, 2023 04:37PM
Ah, hello! I hadn’t looked at the GSAK script and instead started working on translating the OS grid -> latlng part of https://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong-os-gridref.html but it has been somewhat slow. Maybe its datum conversion code helps?
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 12:17AM
Well... the final latitude seems to be wrong but the longitude is correct. Not sure where my mistake is; I assume it's in the final cartesian-to-lat-lng code (since the longitude is correct).

https://gist.github.com/hughcoleman/cbecc52778ed6491a95a00b905f78510
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 12:29AM
Ah, found the bug. Turns out 1e6 is 1000000, not 100000.
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 01:07AM
Alright, @Sowerby, can you confirm to me if these squares look good?

https://project-gc.com/Challenges//79251

Run the checker and then scroll down, look for the map.

(I'll update the grid labels to use the XX 00000 00000 format once you confirm -- no point doing that if the polygons are wrong.)



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 07/10/2023 01:41AM by Hügh. (view changes)
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 08:33AM
@Hügh

The squares are correct

Many thanks
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 05:27PM
Wonderful. You can link to https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5QM86/79251 on your cache page then.
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 09:36PM
@Hügh

Many thanks - you are a star
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 02:52AM
If that works, you can probably easily apply it to the ones I was looking at:
https://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,54860
Re: requesting checker for GC5QM86
July 10, 2023 04:33AM
Oh, I think so, yes! There are a couple other adjustments I want to make so I will do those first. It will be nice to get that old thread marked as completed.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login