[Resolved] two new checkers.

Hello,

Placed two new caches today and need checkers please.

GC72CVY
Challenge is to find 10 caches total across 5 Ontario counties with 5 cache types represented each with a rating of of 2/2.
Must have found a traditional, a multi, a mystery, an Eartchace and a Letterbox. Cache types can be arranged any which way across the 10 as long as there are 5 types in 5 counties with rating 2/2.

GC72CMM
must have found at least one dozen caches in Canada with a minimum of 100 favourite points.

Thanks.
LW

Here is the checker for GC72CMM http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC72CMM/25480

GC72CVY: there is no existing script for this challenge

The alternatives could be
10 different counties and 5 type

your result will look like this
[londonwesty](https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=londonwesty) has used [Project-GC](http://project-gc.com/Challenges//25487 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did.

I've found the following caches fulfilling the challenge:
1. Brant - Traditional Cache: [GC1FPHN](https://coord.info/GC1FPHN) "Can't GIT There From Here!" Series #2 on 2014-04-19
2. Elgin - Unknown Cache: [GC5122Q](https://coord.info/GC5122Q) NERD ALERT!!!! on 2014-04-03
3. Halton - Earthcache: [GC569ZY](https://coord.info/GC569ZY) Rattlesnake Point Limestone Cliffs on 2014-11-16
4. Hamilton - Traditional Cache: [GC4XAA5](https://coord.info/GC4XAA5) In A Nook Shell on 2014-04-19
5. Lennox and Addington - Earthcache: [GC3B217](https://coord.info/GC3B217) High Tide on the Napanee River on 2015-08-21
6. Middlesex - Letterbox Hybrid: [GC5B2DB](https://coord.info/GC5B2DB) This Letterbox is for You...and you...and you! on 2014-11-26
7. Northumberland (Ontario) - Traditional Cache: [GC1DZCX](https://coord.info/GC1DZCX) Stop & Go ...... Port Hope on 2013-08-02
8. Oxford - Traditional Cache: [GC1FFA1](https://coord.info/GC1FFA1) Swimming Sticks on 2014-02-16
9. Wellington - Multi-cache: [GC5NPYD](https://coord.info/GC5NPYD) Everyone Loves an Easy Multi on 2015-04-12
10. York (Ontario) - Traditional Cache: [GC3Y5V2](https://coord.info/GC3Y5V2) #3 King Aethelwulf on 2015-04-05

That'll work. I'll call it the Ontario Five and Dime.

5 cache types in 10 counties

Thanks
LW

Here is the link to the checker http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC72CVY/25487

Thanks. One thing about the output. I like how it displays in a grid when someone succeeds in fulfilling the challenge but when someone doesn't, it doesn't show what they need, how many. See Lisdowney, egghammer. At first its unclear what they are missing. Is it possible to display the grid with the column they are missing be blank? And/or when stating what caches they have, let's say 4, that it says 4 of 5 required?

LW

I've modified the script, now reports the missing values.
the list of values are get from config.validkey1 and config.validkey2

thank Vogelbird for point me to this problem

Some modification of this checker is required.The latest reviewer looking at it is confused and I think it needs a little change.

Ten caches total must be found in 10 counties. 5 cache types only traditional, a multi, a mystery, an Eartchace and a Letterbox.

Each cache type MUST be used twice. My output does show that except the highlight green shows only one for some even though more than one are on the chart. It's a little confusing.

Can you change the output to show just a qualifying GC for the cache type in which county? Right now it is showing GREEN but I would like it to need 2 of each type

TR - GC# - County 1
TR - GC# - County 2
ML - GC# - County 3
ML - GC# - County 4
MY - GC# - County 5
MY - GC# - County 6
EC - GC# - County 7
EC - GC# - County 8
LB - GC# - County 9
LB - GC# - County 10

If you run Hard Oiler he fails the current checker. It says he is missing the Earthcache, yet he has many in Ontario.

LW

The problem is, that you have not specified the rules well.
Now it's clear, you must have found 2 caches of the same type in two different counties and it's not required D/T 2/2.

Hopelessly the checker actually cannot check this condition. I can try to modify it, however it will be hard.
Stand by.

Yeah my bad. I realize it was convoluted. Hopefully it is clearer now. It didn't even make sense to me. The D/T condition of 2/2 is no longer required, you are correct.

I've modified it, try it now.
Hopefully the modify was not hard as I've expected.

Very nice. Thank you!!!