Hi, here's the new checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8CQDY/45115 You can not remove the attatched checker yourself since pieterix tagged it. If you cloned it yourself, you might be able, but not sure.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DMN5/45092 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DKJ8/45088 Be aware that "continent" has no clear definition (neither geographically, nor politically), so there might be some countries that appear in a different continent than you'd maybe expect. Stuff like Greenland, the Carribean, the Canaries, Turkey, Russia, French Guyana, borders in oceania, several iby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Unfortunately I suspect this will declined. Rule 14 of the guidelines forbid "design that limits or punishes any element of finding caches." and this challenge would do just that as you would intentionally not find/seacrh/log a cache that is unfound for 180 days or so. Did you speak to a reviewer about this challenge yet?by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is against rule 9 of the guidelines: Not allowed: Requiring more than one find on any day or calendar date, even if cumulative. Example, find 5 caches for every date of the Finds for Each Day of the Year grid.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh, my bad. Guess I confused the Gemeinde Horgen (county) and the Bezirk Horgen (between county and region). Same for the other.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It seems like this would be the 4th level of administration in Switzerland and thus not allowed. You can have finds based on Kanton and Bazeirk, but nothing below that.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It seems like this would be the 4th level of administration in Switzerland and thus not allowed. You can have finds based on Kanton and Bazeirk, but nothing below that.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It seems like this would be the 4th level of administration in Switzerland and thus not allowed. You can have finds based on Kanton and Bazeirk, but nothing below that.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Np, here's your new one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7Q8FX/45047 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Done, but also the list now only considers the caches that are required for the 10k FPs. I can also make that show the whole list if you want. "wrt" = with respect to (but English isn't my mother tongue so might be erroneous) The change has led me to some thoughts. If someone has all their finds in one region, but can do 10k FPs with only 50 of their finds or so, do they qualby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DGCE/45043 Please let us know if it's suitable. edit: slow :( deleted.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks, please use this link in your listing: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DCRN/45001by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks, please use this link in your listing: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DCRZ/45000by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7Q8FX/45009 Let us know if it's suitable. I started before your last edit, so now it includes the state restriction. Each region (i.e. state/territory or similar) can only contribute a maximum of 90 caches to the list. In case you don't have a user to which the region limit would apply I made a temporary second chby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The challenge is for each month (since Jan 2008) to find a cache that was hidden in that month, and you haven't found a cache that was hidden in September 2019. If you intended the challenge to be for a user to find a cache in each month since January 2008 that's against the guidelines, since lots of people could never fulfill that challenge.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DCRZ/45000 Please provide the correct GC code, so we can add that. Let us know whether the ckecker is suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DCRN/45001 Please provide the correct GC code, so we can add that. Let us know whether the ckecker is suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Btw I can't remove the old checker. I'm not sure whether you have the permission to do so, but you might since you cloned it. Maybe there is some button on the old checker page saying "Remove Tag" under the checker page or the folloing link? https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8AX9N/44985?edit&addTag&tagId=44985 If not, a moderator will remove it soon.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Added full DT matrix restriction. Please test again and let us know if it's fully working this time around.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh, overlooked that one. Fixing.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I assume this is you old checker? https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8AX9N/44985 Here's your new one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8AX9N/44999 Took a bit since all existing scripts including the bingo challenge didn't include the restriction on the finds per size (since that's pretty disconnected thematically) and all scripts that allow multiple conditions didnby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm not sure whether I understand the second condition correctly. Are you saying that at least 10 out of the 100 caches contributing to the 10k FPs must come from a LGA different than the LGA the cache is located in? Would that be Victoria (AU) for this one?by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh, didn't enable the tag. Should work now.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is this your declined challenge? https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8D8RM/44974 If so, we'd remove that one. Here's the new one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8D8RM/44989 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Alright, I've rewritten the script such that multiple criteria per DT grid are possible and have added Australia as a country to each grid. I hope that's ok, @vogelbird? @ZQX: Shouldn't have changed anything other than Australia being mentioned in the output each time. Still, please make sure everything is still working as intended.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hm, guess I'd need to rewrite the script a bit then. Will do later today.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Would take around 20 seconds, aka already done ;)by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Done! Here's your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8DC99/44961 Please let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Nice challenge, I might steal that idea at some point ;) Working on a script.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)