That is perfect. Just the way it was before the four new attributes. Thanks so much. Close this request.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Typo. 64 attributes not 6r attributes.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That is good for the new 68 Attribute challenge. I also need the checker for the existing 64 attribute challenge set back to check for only 6r attributes. gc7mz8dby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
My new challenge cache for 68 attributes is ready. Can the checker for 68 attributes be applied to. https://coord.info/GC8ZQMWby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://coord.info/GC7MZ8D The new checker didn't work out as planned. Can you change this Challenge Cache back to just testing for 64 attributes as it was before we changed it to 68. I will put out a new 68 Attributes Challenge which will use the new checker.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
ok, i am good to go now, thanks,by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Who does the manual update? will the issue resolve itself automatically over time? I'm pretty sure the Solution Checker attributes that PGC is not seeing got added at least a few days ago (but not positivie)by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I spoke too soon. Is there an issue counting the Solution Checker Attribute? I have found 6 such caches, but the checker says 3. User Buckandi - checker says he has found 0, but he found this cache https://coord.info/GC7F2N4 with that attribute.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks. Close my case.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is good, please proceed.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://coord.info/GC7MZ8D with the four new attributes I'd like to change this challenge to a 68 Attribute Challenge rather than 64. Can the checker be changed to require 68 attributes?by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://coord.info/GC8QARK and https://coord.info/GC8QARV Due to the 4 new Attributes, please adjust values for the Attri/bute Cacher to: 94 (Ruby [1]); 99 (Sapphire [2]); 104 (Emerald [3]); 107 (Diamond [4])by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
These are all good. Thanks.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker should test for finds with the new "Challenge Checker" Attribute. 100 - https://coord.info/GC8ZHZQ 200 - https://coord.info/GC8ZHZX 300 - https://coord.info/GC8ZHZZ 400 - https://coord.info/GC8ZJ01 500 - https://coord.info/GC8ZJ06by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is good thanks. I shall be submitting 5 more similar requests soon for 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 Challenge Caches found.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Find 50 caches with the "Challenge Cache" Attribute.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
so I suppose that means that there is nothing that can be done about, right? If so, just close my case.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Checker says user Eagle Rock Rob has not found a cache from a CO starting with a 9. But on 1/19/2013 he found https://coord.info/GCV06V by 91324. I suspect the problem is related to the CO and the optout setting -- CO shows as "A cache by 91324 (§OPTOUT:b0dd20fc§)"by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Yes, it looks good.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Cache https://coord.info/GC8VRRQ was archived. This new cache requires the same checker but with modifications. Remove the requirements for the Daily Cacher, the Calendar Cacher and the Jasmer Cacher. Lower the qualifying threshold to 5 of the 25 items. and address and concerns noted by Groundspeak HQ. I know Pieterix was working on this but here is a new thread to provide status.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Any update on my request? Has Geocaching HQ provided any clarification on what they are talking about?by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the new GC code to which to associate this modified checker. https://coord.info/GC8WK41by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Pieterix, well HQ archived my challenge. see below. I don't agree with point 1, but I can understand the interpretation. Those three loops were not required but helpful. Can you fix that my removing the reference to badges The Daily cacher, the Calendar Cacher, and the Jasmer Cacher. and then lowering the threshold for qualifying to 5 (of the 25 remaining badges). Point 2, I haby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker looks good. Thanks.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Reviewer said he'd publish with the requirement to obtain Six different Loops (of two or more loops) on the 28 badges. So that includes the Calender Cacher, Daily Cacher and Jasmer cacher. Can you modifly the checker to check on the twenty eight listed including those 3. Let me know when ready and I will test.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Clubmud! has been sitting on 84 loops for a loooong time now. Many many months. I did send a request to PGC support for them to look into it. Something odd here, which means it might be happening to other folks too.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Reviewer asked me for clarification so I am still waiting on his ruling. In the meantime, I ran the checker on user "Clubmud!" and the checker says he has 84 loops of the Matrix badge, when in fact BadgeGen shows he has "only" 78 (LOL!) I figured the checker was wrong, but in fact, it is right. His D/T matrix chart shows 84 as the minimum number. Should I report that as aby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
thanks. I just submitted the cache for review by the reviewer with this message: Not ready for publication yet. Need your feedback first. Run the checker and you'll see now that the checker is not counting a second loop for 1) the calendar cacher, 2) the Daily Cacher (streak) and 3) the Jasmer Cacher. Those three criteria would not allow for an invidual challenge on requiring a secoby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well, the Caching Verteran must have been included on the checker from the beginning and I didn't notice it. removing the Caching Veteran from the point count on GC8QARV had a negative impact. Can you lower the qualifying threshold on that one from 90 to 86 points. Otherwise a lot of people who did qualify will not now. I will adjust the cache description. On this challenge countingby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
3. The average can be displayed on https://coord.info/GC8QARV and https://coord.info/GC8QARK. NOTE: The Caching Veteran should be deleted on these two Checkers as well.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)