Page 1 of 2 Pages: 12
Results 1 — 30 of 39
That was super fast, and the checker works perfectly fine for me, many thanks :-)by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, I need a new checker please that checks if a user has found Earthcaches that were published in at least 20 different years. Many thanks in advance, Daniel aka InQbuSby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That works perfectly fine, many thanks for the quick reply :-)by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, for my new challenge GCARJC8 I need a checker that validates if a user has found caches with a total of 45721 favourite points in the following county: County: Recklinghausen (Kr) Region: Nordrhein-Westfalen Country: Germany There should be no restriction on cache types. Many thanks in advance Daniel aka InQbuSby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh shoot - yes I know this rule and have no idea why I forgot about it. Apologies and rhanks for reminding me. I will have to rethink how to make the Challenge acceptable.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Hi, I am planning to publish a challenge where a cacher is required to log caches in ten consecutive Latitude degrees as well as 10 consecutive Longitude degrees. Both these don't have to be straight lines, hence they also don't need to cross. As an example, these are the Latitudes and Longitudes that I would qualify with: I have found caches in the following Latitude degrees: N47by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Yeah no worries, I am happy with the checker ☺️ Thanks again for your great support!by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes this is great, thanks. The return message if the player doesn't qualify is a bit misleading (as it doesn't tell all the missing types/caches) but the checker as such works fine! I assume it's not very straight forward to modify that return message, is it? Thanks again for your great support Danielby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, I am planning to publish a challenge that requires the cacher to find four different types of caches with D/T rating of 5/5, of which: - a 5/5 cache of one type was found at least once - a 5/5 cache of a second type was found in at least two different countries - a 5/5 cache of a third type was found in at least three different countries - a 5/5 cache of a fourth type was found in at leaby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, just checked and yes, that is exactly what I was looking for, many thanks :-) This topic can be closed.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, I intend to publish a challenge where the cacher qualifies if he/she has found at least - one cache with a Difficulty rating of 5.0 and - one cache with a Terrain rating of 5.0 for each of the five cache types with physical log book (i.e. Traditional, Mystery, Multi, Letterbox, Wherigo). If the cacher has found a 5/5 cache, it qualifies for both the Difficulty and Terrain requirement.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Many thanks, this one is now doing exactly what I need :-) This topic can be closed.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Many thanks, this works but is currently set as 20 caches. As I am now accumulating over months and not days, can you please amend it to be 50 rather than 20? Thanks Daniel aka InQbuSby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh god, how could I misread this? I'm sorry! I am going to change the Checker request to be cumulative over a month rather than a specific calendar day. It will be less challenging but according to the guidelines this should then be feasible.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, I have created a new Challenge Cache, which requires the cacher to have accumulated 50 containerless caches within one month of the year, i.e. it is not required to do these all in one month, but can be done during the same month across several years. Could you therefore please create a Checker that checks for cumulative finds per month and considers the following cache types: - Virtualby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works as expected now :-)by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Brilliant, many thanksby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh that will be the problem, all these types of events should count in please! Edit: So I just double checked and for that user the low event was indeed a Mega Event. Would be great if you could include all different types of events for this Checker :-) Many thanks in advance!by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, it seems I've been a little fast with my feedback. The Reviewer has made me aware that qualifying users are showing as "not qualifying" through the Challenge Checker, can you please check why? Examples: Uwe-147 - Event with lowest Elevation according to the project-gc stats: -1 - Event with highest Elevation according to the project-gc stats: 673 golf63 - Eventby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Perfect, many thanks! This is doing exactly what I needby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi there, for my new challenge I need a checker that does the following: Check the Elevation of all attended Events for the following criteria: 1) The lowest elevation is negative (less than 0 metres) 2) The highest Elevation is positive (more than 0 metres) 3) The difference between the lowest and highest elevation is at least 500 metres Edit: It would be perfect if the events with theby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks for the advice. I had also replied in the original thread but that was already moved to the archived checker requests.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello, I have previously requested for a Checker to be created for a country themed BINGO Challenge. This was the link provided: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA40R8/74499 I have now swapped a couple of countries and would need the checker to be amended: Swap the following Countries: Finland with Malta Switzerland with Sweden Ireland with Czech Republic Many thanks in advancby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, would it be possible to modify the Challenge Checker as follows? Swap the following Countries: Finland with Malta Switzerland with Sweden Ireland with Czech Republic Many thanks in advance!by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi there, just a hint from me on this one, as I've also got a couple of continent specific challenge caches: A continent as such is no valid criteria for a challenge cache! What I had to do is create "country lists" and embed them in the challenge, in order to get it approved, because a list of countries is valid. So just in case you struggle to get the challenge approved,by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Many thanks, this works perfectly fineby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello, I am planning to publish a european country themed BINGO Challenge Cache where you qualify if you get five countries in a row (usual BINGO rules, i.e. horizontal, vertical, diagonal). The countries in the BINGO card can be checked if you have found at least one cache in that country. The only cache type that is excluded is Locationless (even though I don't think there are any Locatioby InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks a lot again, now the output looks good :-)by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Brilliant! Many, many thanks for your great help with this :-) There's one strange thing though - some of the output statements seems incorrect even though the check works fine - example for GC9WH2A (looks similar for GC9WH22 and GC9WH25 for checks 4, 5 and 6): There were 6 continents. 6 were required. Completed criteria 1 This is fine. There were 6 continents. 5 were required.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Even though I found enough users who fulfill the criteria, I decided to cancel this cache and therefore don't require the script anymore. Are you OK to close this thread please before any more effort is put into this? Apologies for any inconvenience caused.by InQbuS - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)