Fixed.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
magma1447 Wrote: > tagId:49319 creator:pieterix gccode:GC8M1V1 Not affected, since it's UK and not Canada.by pieterix - Checker news
Maybe I gave the wrong link, but the script is there: "Same X Different Y (by SeekerSupreme) extended"by pieterix - Miscellaneous
This one should do it: https://project-gc.com/Tools/Challenges?edit&scriptId=3236by pieterix - Miscellaneous
Updated to require 4 in years 2002, 2003, 2004 & 2005.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Started off with the wrong source code. All fixed now.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've extended my script and then wanted to test the checker so I disabled the tag done by vogelbird so it doesn't affect the stats when I ran the checker and now I can't find the checker. Please enable it again vogelbird so I can test my new code.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hardcoded list added. Please try it and let me know if it's all good now?by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Odd. I'm using PGC.GetAttributeList() to get the list of all the attributes and base my decision on whether to include or skip a negative attribute by whether it has a negative image or not. This used to work but it seems this function now returns negative images for ALL the attributes, which means I have no way to automatically skip a nonsensical negative attribute other than to hardcode thby pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Updated comment.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Updated.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Updated.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, it should be possible.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@vogelbird Ah yes, I forgot about that small detail.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Firstly, NOBODY was rude to you, so I have no idea where you're seeing any rudeness? In fact, I think your responses to @Pleu are rude and uncalled for. Secondly, I've modified the checker to drop the type restriction.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Script extended with "showboth" parameter. I've used xxx km / xxx miles as display but can change that to another format as well, eg. xxx km (xxx miles).by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I never received a response from the script writer, so the checker still has an issue that it could count the current year as complete even though we're still mid year. I bypassed this issue by providing a fixed point at the end of the year instead of the current date/month (which I've now changed to 2022-12-31). However, this means the checker will have to be updated each year to moveby pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Labcaches included now. Please test and let us know if it's working correctly?by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Apologies for my absence. Checker adjusted. @vogelbird: thanks for the poke.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I suspected they would deny challenges like this. They seem to be anti anything where something is excluded. But then again they're not very consistent with their decisions, especially when it comes to their souvenir challenges where users often have to do stuff that are actually against challenge guidelines (date based finds where some people have to effectively stop caching until that starby pieterix - Script development
You're not the first to have this idea, but no, I never finished the script I envisaged. :-)by pieterix - Script development
Seems like you're asking for a new checker on a new GC code? If so, here's the new checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9EPZR/62425by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Updated to 102.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That badge script should probably be left alone, since it was for challenges for badges v3. Changing the script would change the challenges. Badges v4 was coded by myself from scratch not using the PGC.GetBadgeGenData() call, since reviewers didn't accept challenges based on that function given rule 4. Subsequently they now don't accept any new badge related challenges, so the new methoby pieterix - Checker news
Do you mean this? local args = {...} local env = args[1].environmentSettings PGC.print(env.maxExecutionTime) local deadline = os.time()+env.maxExecutionTime-5 to end: if (os.time > deadline) then "abort" endby pieterix - Method requests
What is a Sleeping Beauty?by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@vogelbird: they're legacy challenges.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@vogelbird: Great, that makes it much easier on the script! @DrPflug: added Achiever badge to script and adjusted your challenge checker limits.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@vogelbird: do you know where the exception list for challenges is kept? Since I obviously need to exclude those.by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looking into it...by pieterix - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)