Yes they will need to be removed. The result of the can be shown on maps etc when autorunned The one one i tagger are remove. I recommend contacting sumbloke directly since only the tagger can remove themby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Fixed. But remember to next time that the checkers are per gc code. Use the cache listing you sent here for that challenge. No need to move challenge between gc codes you can change the relevant thing on the listing.by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That it not a complete checker. no tesing is done. You likely to show that there are a sufficient number of caches that meet the requirement and likly "near" the challenge The coordinates looked for are in degrees and decimale minute. I did not att a decimal point since i cpoied the format i used in the checker and added blankspace 37 53896 122 19405 sould have been formatet N37by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It meed what is says. Checker scripts has to be disabled to be edited. Either the script writer is editing the script now or has forgot to enable itby Target. - Miscellaneous
Upps now enablesby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
GC code is needed specify what is exactly required. And it is not allowed to require find on feb 29 anymore since it can take 4 years to completed it. I got a rejection because of that this morning. But is was a hidden date not a found date challenge and the reviewer misinterpreted the challenge If you what to check what dates are missing for you there is a tool for that with filter optionby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I was interested and wrote a test script http://project-gc.com/Challenges//22716 I noticed that the ‰ of ok caches diffed between the posters in this thread. The last numbers is the coordinate of first ok find sumbloke 74 35 17898 149 07256 target 54 58 26037 015 34891 Psychoticjester 26 37 53896 122 19405 I suspect the reason for the diffby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is possible and quite easy to code. But for the question is it allowed? It is not obvious against the guidelines. But create the challenge and send it to the reviewer without a checker and ask.by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You cant write checkers if you are not allowed to now. There will be a process to add writers. When that will happen have I not idea of. If you are interested how it works you can read all code of exinsing checkers and read the documentation in the forum. I dont know if the API is linked from there but it is http://project-gc.com/doxygen/lua-sandbox/classPGC__LUA__Sandbox.htmlby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Strange way to read the guidlines since it is quite explicit that only country/region/county is ok and anything else is not allowed. Other that have asked rewiever for similar limits have hade it denied. I assume you have asked after the august update of the guidelines I would not be surprised if it will be archived by HQ if they notice it But i mark this thread as resolved and archive itby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I was goint to write status change but i looked at the checker. You config includes min and max lattitude like the following line {country="Sweden",region="Stockholm",minlatitude=59.291667, maxlatitude=59.375, minlongitude=17.966667, maxlongitude=18.108333}, The problem is that that is not allowed guideline 10 not allowed QuoteChallenges based on geographic areas otheby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Created http://project-gc.com/Challenges//22695by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I crated in but need to addgccode. You have a problem and that is that you only have 2 caches >=51FP in Extremaduraby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can tag it but it will be >=51% But you need to post the gc codeby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No is it %FP on caches not % of caches in areaby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is impossible to know if a cache had >51% FP on the date of the log. The only information the checkers has is the current FP. I suggest that you change it to that you have have logged 5 caches with >51% FP (or perhaps >%50 FP) Not at time of found but any time after when you run the checker and can show it. Just write that you have to have 5 finds with >51% FP. And that you haveby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Created http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6RYMN/22690 I hope it is correct please checkby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Of you read the guideline for challenges there is one that forbids using the name of a cache as part of a challenge. If I understan correctly your idea the closes alternative is to require a find in each of counties that the city is in. That is the smallest area allowed in challengeby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Or you can use this one that gives an output that is easier to read especially if you don't meet the requirements, http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5KY9W/22654by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Strange that two the two combines are not allowed. There is nothing obvious against that if. The problem might be the following: QuoteA challenge cache needs to appeal to and be attainable by a reasonable number of cachers. Your reviewer may ask for a list of cachers from your area who qualify. Not that is not possible. The checkers has no access to home coordinates and it is against the guiby Target. - Miscellaneous
The checker is possible but is it allowed? I suspect spirit caches is identified by name or bookmaklist and that is not allowed to be used Guidline 10. Source of Criteria not acceptable QuoteThese listing elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer or listing text. Guideline 11. Specific Lists not accaptable QuoteA challenge based on elements under the cache owneby Target. - Miscellaneous
If they both are correct/identical there is no problem is both exist. There might be a difference in output to the user. I suspect the number of checker that are duplicate are quite small. If not identical the incorrect one should be disabled/removeby Target. - Miscellaneous
Now when I look I notice that feb 29 was not necessary on min. It is possible to create a checker for DT matrix and calendar except feb 29by Target. - Miscellaneous
You can find the remove button here: http://project-gc.com/Tools/Challenges?edit&addTag&tagId=22559 But why was it no allowed? It is a combination of find dates and DT matrix. I have published challenges based on those to myself with the new rules.by Target. - Miscellaneous
I noticed that the cache is published. If you have the problem again the important part is that the correct GC code is listed where it is now before the the cache name. The name is missing before publication and is added automatically when the cache is published and detected by project-gc. The confusion is because challenge checkers are two parts. A (often) generic checker script for many cacby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
There is a small problem that you can use the "tag script" button that takes you to the listing of all tag in the checker where the remove button is. Has been bug reported Post the GC code and i will send you the link to the page where you can remove itby Target. - Miscellaneous
Not allowed. Read the challenge guidelines http://support.groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=206by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
You have a problem your result is the following . You don't have enough finds 4 and 5 days after publication Days since publish number finds 1 7 2 8 3 4 4 2 5 3 Created another tag for 100 day so one can see the result I made day 1-8by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Created http://project-gc.com/Challenges//22521by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That is enough information. The missing information was the value that was only n in the first postby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)