Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GWQA/47252 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GGZ3/47226 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In diesem Checker sind auch eigene Caches mitgezählt: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5JP9Z/47210 Sag uns einfach, welchen du verwenden willst, den anderen entferne ich dann. PS: "grandfathered" bezieht sich auf den Cache, nicht auf das Geschlecht des Owners, falls du das meinst ;)by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@vogelbird This is a grandfathered challenge @tomine193 Hier ist ein Checker für dich: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5JP9Z/47203 Bitte ein Mal testen, ob alles funktioniert wie gewollt.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@vogelbird: pietrix' checker does not allow for an array of countries, only a single country. @JustFindingOurWay: I have an alternative checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GT9N/47194 This one states the requirements a bit differently, but checks for the same thing. In the checker regions are allowed to be used multiple times, which is for example why one requiremenby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, only traditionals.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
True, also makes it easier to check for missing letters. Changed it, thanks for suggesting.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If you give us the GC code of your challenge we can provide a checker for you.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Adding only Traditionals is no problem. Here's a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7X9DH/47154 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have a checker for any 20 letters, out of the 25. If you give me the GC Code of your challenge I can provide you the checker.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can create a new script for this, but probably only later this week. But if anyone else wants to write the script or gets an existing checker to work with this (maybe ari's multi-checker?), feel free to do so.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
For a streak up to 365 days, yes.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The 7 day streak of Mysteries is not allowed. QuoteNot acceptable: Specifying any element of a cache page (type, rating, etc.) or find count (above one per day) required during a streak. For the other requirements I don't know whether there is an existing script, but it'd be easy to create one.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GQ3Q/47068 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GPZJ/47064 You can just request multiple checkers in one thread, or just open a new thread for each, as you wish. Let us know if the checker is suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm pretty sure this is again because of the deleted profiles due to GDPR. The placed_by field of a find seems to be nil, while the owner_id is 1 (which is not actually the id of any user). magma already fixed the OwnerId2Name function for the case that the owner_id is 1. Maybe a similar fix for placed_by might be good.by PattuX - Miscellaneous
I agree with arisoft's suggestion to simply display a warning. Determining whether a challenge is V1/V2 compatible automatically is pretty much impossible. I also think not allowing cloning on scripts is the way to go since many scripts can produce tags that may or may not be allowed with V2 (e.g. general regex checkers or muli-test checkers). Plus, as ari already mentioned, people mightby PattuX - Miscellaneous
My bad, forgot to enable it. Should work now. I also reordered them, so they should line up with your letter-labels now.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In general we do not have data for areas below counties or equivalent (Landkreise in Germany). Such challenges are also not publishable anymore, so I wouldn't hold my breath anyone is willing to create/search for the polygons for the cities and muncipalities. Given the polygons are available someone may create a checker tho.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC84ZY5/47041 The rows are reversed tho, as that's also how the checker for the other challenge was arranged. Hope that's ok. Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GP28/47040 Let us know if it's suitableby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Also on arisoft's script? There don't seem to be other tags for this type of challenge (or I'm missing them).by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GHQQ/47024 Let us know if it's suitableby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Exchanging the radius for finds in Ontario would solve the issue with the first requirement. My concern with the third rule is that you're also requiring finds in an area that is based on a polygon (triangle) rather than a country/state/county. However I'm not 100% sure whether it would be declined since you're not requiring finds in some set polygon you defined, but rather letby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GMQA/47010 Only counting normal events at the moment, but I can add some of the special event types (CITO/Mega/Giga/Anniversary) if you wish. Let us know which way you prefer.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The first condition certainly violates rule 10 of the challenge guidelines, possibly condition 3 does as well. QuoteNot allowed: Challenges based on geographic areas other than countries, states/provinces, counties (or their local equivalent). For example, user-defined mapping polygons, latitude/longitude, radius, etc. Additionally we would not even have access to the user's home coordiby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
You can tell from the first and last tile of the chain, e.g. if the output is: nr. tile GCCODE hidden found name 1. 3.0/27|1.0/24 GC4QVXE 2014-03-27 2018-07-24 Rupicapra 2. 1.0/24|3.5/15 ... 43. 1.5/17|4.0/14 GC3P24C 2012-07-17 2017-05-14 Vergessene Brücke Mini-Multi-LP you can continue at the front with a T3.0 found on a 27th or append a cache at the end with a D4.0 hidden on the 14th.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Done, please test again.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is stated that Lab Caches may not be used for challenge caches in rule 10 of the guidelines: QuoteNot allowed: Trackable, Benchmarking, Waymarking logs, or specifying Lab Cache finds.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8GM3W/47000 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)