Adjusted and tested with myself and a user with 0 finds, both worked. But as always, best if you test a bit yourself so there isn't some other scenario I didn't take into account.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC48868/49674 It checks cachename for regular A-Z capital letters, not the various umlauts and similar.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8KJG8/49432by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Only checks if "county" starts with F (since there's no data on which city). https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8E7ZN/49401by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8KXZH/49267 It'll limit verbose countrylist to 3 per continent and cachelist to 7 per country.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8CMGX/46005 It prioritizes primary pyramid for output when someone doesn't qualify. That means for someone like me it will use Sweden to show best (guestimated) match for primary to show me what I'm lacking to fulfil it, even if Sweden would fulfil the secondary pyramid. Since if it used Sweden to fulfil the secondary it would show Finland as bby olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, that shouldn't be too much trouble to do. It's too late for me to do now, but will try and get it done tomorrow.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Just asking for clarification for "also a level by different type", didn't mention different countries since it wasn't relevant for my question. If it's meant like I interpret it, it makes it a whole lot harder to write a checker (and to me, not at all fun). Just two different pyramids (for different countries) would be amusing enough for me to do.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
When you say "..., also a level by different type", does that mean that at least one level of the secondary pyramid must be different than the main one? As in, if the main one is: Level 1: Trad Level 2: Multi Level 3: Myst Level 4: Event Level 5: Letterbox Level 6: WIG Level 7: EC Level 8: Mega event Level 9: Giga event Then the secondary pyramid can't be: Level 1:by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Good point, updated the text.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I replace the hidden field with published if it's there (remembered late about two different dates, and just did a quick and dirty fix, prior to enabling it for the first time). So while the output uses the "hidden" field, the data is almost always from the "last_publish_date" field.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You think too much of users, that they'll actually look over the list and double check if their list is correct. But since you requested the checker I'll simply disable the break, and it will now list all caches, if it's 30, 300 or 3000.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It uses "last_publish_date" field if it's present (older caches does not have it), otherwise it uses the "hidden" field. For the cache you mentioned this is the data I have access to: Array ( => 2007-10-07 => Unknown Cache => 2007-10-09 => 706732 => 2007-10-07 => Mystery Riffs (Mpls) => 1 => 44.8by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3MQ6H/45963 As far as I know, it's correct (last 10 verified, and checked users with both >125 and <125 + streak).by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC4EFR4/45962by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
As far as I know, it's complete, but it seems the challenge isn't published yet.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3R208/43814by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC4QRFB/43764 It does not output best day if you don't qualify since people can't go back in time to that date and fix it afterwards.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Updated. The requirement was set to 0 on the last run, now the requirement will never go below 1.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Way nicer output than mine, so use this one. I'm removing mine.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
As far as PGC is concerned, it's two different words for the same thing (state and region). The areas are divided up in Country (such as the u.s or Canada), region (such as Texas or Kansas in the u.s, or Alberta or Ontario in Canada) and counties (such as 'Orange County' or 'Edmonton'). So when you say "state" do you mean what PGC sees as a region or U.S sby olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Not how I understood it. I read it as 5 different areas (on region level) and rereading it it's still how I interpret it (their example is 3 u.s states and 2 countries). Scott&Brandi will just have to clarify what it is they want.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Try https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ACPP/43755 More specific for the challenge.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ACQC/43720by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I just made some minor changes (to make it generic), so you may want to test it once or twice again to make sure I didn't break anything.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ABNQ/43716by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It already skipped current month. Now it also skips the current and past two.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In this case, it's not so bad because the initial script was pretty easy and straightforward and should only be additional coding for further requirements (ie, I can keep all the code in place already, just have to add new code for the new requirements). So if you want to make it a hiking one that should be fine. You just can't keep adding (or removing) requirements because the base cby olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Finish your idea first, then request a checker. Don't waste other peoples time. You only mentioned a change of average T required, which is easy (just needs a 5sec config change, not a code change). Adding additional things may take time, and it may require lots of rewrites to suit the new requirements.by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC89M77/43539by olalb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)