That worked great! The checker passed all my tests. I ran 80 or so names through it and everything worked as expected for all types of geocache. The link from the checker page and cache page lead to each other, the GC code is correct. The red and green numbers reflect the correct number of passes and fails, and the output script gives a really good accounting of the qualifying finds. Thank yby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello sir or madam. The challenge for GCAMJZ5 is to find a geocache with both the 'teamwork' attribute and the 'special tool' attribute. The two attributes have to be assigned to the same geocache. I qualify for this challenge and so do 10 locals. We have the go ahead from the local reviewer Blue Rajah. Thanks for the help. CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In case anyone is following this beyond Vogelbird and I, Hügh found a checker that does the physical streak: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6JWV8/20958 Gentlemen, thank you for the great work you do. Now I need to go and do some serious work on these challenges.by CheekyBrit - Miscellaneous
Those are awesome. Thank you so much vogelbird. The DT checker for counties looks like the exact one I was looking at before. I've noticed the 365 physical streak checker only shows the streak someone is currently on. Its still a great tool. Thank you.by CheekyBrit - Miscellaneous
I must have a terrible reputation amongst reviewers and at HQ because quite a handful of my challenges have launched discussions in the reviewer only forum and gone through the appeals process. I agree that HQ typically side with the reviewers from my experience, but I recon it isn't just blindly agreeing. The reasoning has always been sound, once I take a step back and think about it, evenby CheekyBrit - Miscellaneous
Somewhere out there in the vast project-gc universe are two amazing checkers that I once used and have since lost. One was a challenge checker that will show you the DT grid of your finds in the single county you are closest to completing. The other was a checker to see if you have a 1 year streak using only physical geocaches (not events, virtuals, labs, or earth caches). I used both some timeby CheekyBrit - Miscellaneous
That looks fantastic. Thanks again Vogelbird.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello and good day to you. I built a challenge cache and the epic project-gc team coded a lovely checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAFTYX/83007 However, someone noticed it is asking for the wrong number. It is supposed to require 100 combinations of U.S. state and size, but it only requires 50. May someone please adjust that? Everything else about the checker is perfect! Thaby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Vogelbird, you legend! The new checker works fantastically. The test works for both positive and negative tests across a batch of 50+ people. The red and green numbers in the checker are accurate to the number of successful tests done, the links on checker page and cache page link to each other, the correct GC code is in place, and it runs pretty fast. The updated full list of 20 counties isby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Vogelbird, you legend. That works so well. Thank you for the new script. Cheers, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Perfection! Thank you Svarträv. I am in awe of the work that you and your fellow checker builders do with that lua code. You lot help keep the game within a game alive and well. Cheers, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That was the one. Everything looks correct. Thanks again Svarträv Cheers, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Wow. I'm super impressed you knew that and even thought to check for that. I knew they changed their state region system but when I pulled up an old and a new map I foolishly thought I had the newest. Upon further research, it seems like Connecticut has changed their boundaries on at least 5 occasions. What on earth?!?! I tried the checker and it works a treat! Thank you for the help.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Svarträv taht did the trick. Thank you for making the adjustment. The rest of the functionality remains intact and works just like it should. I ran an extra 30+ names through it just to double check and everything was perfect. AWESOME. This checker request can be moved to the completed and archived folder. Thanks for your help. Cheers, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Everything looks good except the tag comment. It currently says "30 type/size combinations". I don't know if this is a big issue, but I think it is supposed to say "30 type/terrain combinations".by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Svarträv this is excellent. As far as functionality it ticks all the boxes. It performs for both positive and negative tests with the correct goal of 50. The link between cache page and checker page link to each other, the GC code is correct, and the green and red numbers reflect the correct number of successful and failed tests. The sides are now organized in correct order AND we still have tby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I almost missed a funny quirk. I don't know if that was always the case or just occurred since the lastest change, but this checker is showing the results for DIFFICULTY versus month hidden, rather than TERRAIN versus hidden month. May we change that please? Thank you, CheekyBritby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That did the trick! Thank you very much for fixing that. Everything is behaving just like it should and it ticks all the boxes. It performs for both positive and negative tests with the correct goal of 10. The link between cache page and checker page link to each other, the GC code is correct, and the green and red numbers reflect the correct number of successful and failed tests. No matter whby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Fantastic. Thank you so much for your help with the checker. I'm glad my concern was nothing to worry about. We can triumphantly move this to the completed folder.by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello Hügh. I'm sorry to do this, but I need a tweak made to this challenge checker. Fish fry and I had incomplete intel and there are 20 counties that should be on the list. Would you please add to the list of counties that count for the 5 qualifying counties: Hartford county CT, Ada county ID, Washoe county NV, Broome county NY, and Davis county UT. That brings the total listby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi Svarträv, I'm really sorry to do this, but is it possible to change the goal from 100 down to 50? As I was running my batch of usernames through, I realized this was a really steep goal for a challenge, especially one that wasn't difficulty 5. Other than that, absolutely everything on the checker worked perfectly. As far as functionality it ticks all the boxes. It performs fby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi Svarträv this is excellent. As far as functionality it ticks all the boxes. It performs for both positive and negative tests with the correct goal of 15. The link between cache page and checker page link to each other, the GC code is correct, and the green and red numbers reflect the correct number of successful and failed tests. There is the extra feature that clicking in a box links to anby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi Svarträv this is excellent. As far as functionality it ticks all the boxes. It performs for both positive and negative tests with the correct goal of 10. The link between cache page and checker page link to each other, the GC code is correct, and the green and red numbers reflect the correct number of successful and failed tests. There is the extra feature that clicking in a box links to anby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I don't know if this is going to be an issue, but it does run a little slower than any other checker i've used. Some of the the really big data sets for prolific cache finders like mondou2 couldn't finish running. He's the only one it didn't finish with. My concern would be causing too much traffic on the server. You would know if that is something we can ignore or not, iby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you Svarträv, this is excellent. As far as functionality it ticks all the boxes. It performs for both positive and negative tests with the correct goal of 100. The link between cache page and checker page link to each other, the GC code is correct, and the green and red numbers reflect the correct number of successful and failed tests. I really like the extra features you added, likeby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for the checkers. I'm going to go with the 83009 checker since it has the difficulties in order. As far as functionality it ticks all the boxes. It performs for both positive and negative tests with the correct goal of 30. The link between cache page and checker page link to each other, the GC code is correct, and the green and red numbers reflect the correct number of successfulby CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for building the checker. I noticed the terrain rows are shuffled around. Is it possible to have them in order from 1 through 5 please?by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for building the checker. I noticed the terrain columns are shuffled around. Is it possible to have them in order from 1 through 5 please?by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for building the checker. I noticed the difficulty columns are shuffled around. Is it possible to have them in order from 1 through 5 please?by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Everything looks really nice but something unusual is happening with certain people's names. Plugging in ChubbuckGranny gives the expected result but CheekyBrit gives the result in Unknown caches. It's not just the images and text, the output is showing my 81 unknown finds and not the expected 77 traditional finds (I'm a slacker and need to find 4 more).by CheekyBrit - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)