thx. doneby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
A few years after publication, someone pointed out that checker to my cache GC7DB5W had an error in the conditions. There should be 21 counties, not 26 Can I ask for modification?by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Many thanks. Now is everything ok. Many thanksby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker is working fine, but there is a little bug in table of results. For pair : Średzki (Dolnośląskie) -Średzki (Wielkopolskie) results are shown in one row instead (like other counties pair) two separate. In second row is presented number of total finds in Poland.by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello I need a new checker for GCA3JF1 Task: In each county that makes up two of the following pairs, find at least 5 caches County pairs 1. Bielski (Podlaskie) - Bielski (Śląskie) 2. Brzeski (Małopolskie) - Brzeski (Opolskie) 3. Grodziski (Mazowieckie) - Grodziski (Wielkopolskie) 4. Krośnieński (Lubuskie) - Krośnieński (Podkarpackie) 5. Nowodworski (Mazowieckie) - Nowoby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You are wrong. Rule #10 criteria refers to the definition of the division of the world into specific administrative units, instead of polygons freely defined / defined by the author of the challenge. You used to be able to set yourself a challenge, e.g. find X cache in district Y in city Z. This don't have nothing with limitations challenges based on for example "attributes criteriaby ru.beus - Miscellaneous
Idea was nice and the reviewer in theory would publish the challenge, but not only in the region but also throughout Poland there will not be 10 people who would meet these requirements. Unfortunately, the task of visit all counties in Poland is currently at the top. Maybe in a few years I will return to this idea, when the challenge with one pair of counties will become popular. Thank you forby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
What about that soultion: In each county that makes up two of the following pairs, find at least 5 caches County pairs 1. Bielski (Podlaskie) - Bielski (Śląskie) 2. Brzeski (Małopolskie) - Brzeski (Opolskie) 3. Grodziski (Mazowieckie) - Grodziski (Wielkopolskie) 4. Krośnieński (Lubuskie) - Krośnieński (Podkarpackie) 5. Nowodworski (Mazowieckie) - Nowodworski (Pomorskie) 6.by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Ok. But what If a want create a cache with checker just for fun and for motiwation to competition for geicachers from my area ? Not official challenge? A tradi or letterbox ?by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Oh noooooo....by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Hello For my cache https://coord.info/GCA3JF1 I need a bit changed version of this https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9F7XJ/62681 New criteria - number of pairs of counties - two (instead one) number of caches : 5 (instead 10) I need test to check if I found 10 ppl on my area. If not the number of caches may be changedby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Sorry for not responding. They works but not returned name of badge/checkera on resultsby ru.beus - Miscellaneous
Only finds and hides in Poland counts. Popular - found 100 caches. No other critetia Bronze - found at last 250 caches, hide 10 caches. Extra criteria: found cache in 4 different voivodeships, hide 2 different cache types. Silver - found at last 500 caches, hide 25. Extra criteria: found cache in 6 different voivodeships, hide 4 different cache types incuding event. Gold - found at last 100by ru.beus - Miscellaneous
There is a 4 levels of badge. Popular, bronze, Silver, gold Each rank of the badge has its own criteria based on the number of caches found, the number and type of hidden caches, and the number of voivodeships visited - all only in Poland. I need tool that will werify condition for each badge rank.by ru.beus - Miscellaneous
Hello Is it possible to create a checker not associated with any cache? I need a tool to verify the conditions for awarding tourist badges related to geocaching. Previously, this was supported by a page that had API access to geocaching.com but the person running it decided to close the site.by ru.beus - Miscellaneous
Thx. Working fineby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Heh... I need downgrade requiments . Pls set 50 finds for attribute: Livestock nerby Number of finds for atribute: yard - don't change Thank youby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello I need new checker for cache GC9G41N To qualify, geocacher need find at last a: 150 caches with attribute: Livestock nerby and 50 with attribute Yard (private residence) Thank youby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well, Cyprus (entirely in Asia) should disappear from the list and Kazakhstan (12% of the territory in Europe) and Turkey should appear. I check and think.by ru.beus - Miscellaneous
Many thanks for link. As I saw Technicaly checker is created only one thing to do is reduce number of countries to 5.by ru.beus - Miscellaneous
I have an idea for a challenge - find a cache in any 5 capitals of European countries. Perhaps technically possible, because only finds in 'districts' (counties) are checked - but probably time-consuming programming without giving a ready list?by ru.beus - Miscellaneous
Working fine. Many thanksby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello For my cache GC9F441 i need checker Condition: Found at least two physical caches (tradi, multi, mystery, letterbox, wherirgo) in in every country bordering the Baltic Sea. Countries:Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, Denmark, Sweden and Russiaby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello A checker for GC83RQT working correctly and thank you again for its preparation. Today, my challenge has been published and when checking the conditions by persons having at last one cache in all (or mostly) counties in Poland, some specific error for condition No. 3 "In any of 22 out of the 30 counties of the Mazowieckie voivodship listed below, find 2 caches", has come toby ru.beus - Miscellaneous
sorry for the confusion. Can you change the requirements for GC83RQT New requirements below 1) find at least two cache in 3 out of 5 given counties (poviats) in Łódzkie voivodship (Poland) [...] counties list without change 2) find at least two cache in in 3 out of 6 given counties (poviats) in Podlaskie voivodship (Poland) wysokomazowiecki grajewski zambrowski łomżyńskiby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
sorry for the confusion. can you change the requirements regarding the number of found caches from one to two? further terms with no changes. I checked the searchers from my region and too many people can pass the challenge without any difficulty ?by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thx. Working fine.by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry. My mistake Properly - 1) find at least one cache in in 3 out of 5 given coounties [...].by ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello For my cache GC83RQT I need a not usualy county checker. To qualify, the geocacher need to fulfill all three condtion: 1) find at least one cache in 4 out of 6 given counties (poviats) in Łódzkie voivodship (Poland) kutnowski łowicki rawski skierniewicki Skierniewice 2) find at least one cache in in 3 out of 5 given coounties (poviats) in Podlaskie voivodship (Polby ru.beus - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
could you please remove this checker for cache GC7DB05 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7DB05/29201 Its redunatet Thank Youby ru.beus - Miscellaneous