I've re-enabled the tag for you. Please check it again.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The voting page currently says 3 votes are needed. Assuming that means that there are 3 caches below the threshold, it would put the threshold somewhere between 41% and 53% (the current 3rd and 4th lowest confidence levels).by sumbloke - Challenge checker exceptions
Sorry, my bad. I misunderstood the requirements. I'll work on some tweaks to the script, but OP seems happy with your tag.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Can I suggest that better output using the same script can be achieved using https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAACAQ/78813 Also, I note that iatsemedic only has 14 counties (Kent County, Michigan seems to be at 91 and the closest to being their 15th).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In my mind, a challenge cache requires a certain number of finds in a specific category, but doesn't require all of a specific list. All of a specific list (especially if it's a list containing some of that CO's other caches) would be a bonus cache.by sumbloke - Challenge checker exceptions
I believe those fields are for the negative attributes. It's in the same format as the positive attributes (attributes_set_[1/2/3]), being an integer where each bit corresponds to one of the attributes.by sumbloke - Script development
Strange, last I knew I was still subscribed to topics after they got moved but I didn't get an email about that reply. I guess that leaves the "Contact" buttons on the checker page as the most reliable way to contact me.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Swapped as requested. In future, I would suggest either contacting the tagger (in this case myself) directly (using the link on the checker page) or responding in the original thread. Creating a new thread relies on the tagger noticing it. And since the tagger (apart from a couple of administrators) is the only one who can modify a tag, you'll need to contact the same person.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That script doesn't have the requested output on fail, which I added to my script.by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
Not on that script, but I've tweaked my Multiple test checker script to be able to handle that. For example: {"func":"and","opt":{"func":"range","conf":{"field":"elevation","min":2000,"limit":1}},"conf":[ {"conf":{"types":["Traditional Cache"]}}, {&by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
I've tagged this one against your GC code. The updated URL is https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA3XD2/74843 The other tags will have to be removed by Hügh and vogelbird.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ah, sorry. Tweaked again with your suggestion. Day: * Qualifiers * This column represents how many different icons you have already found on this day of the month. 01: 12 GC8M98G: Community Celebration Wednesday Night Pizza!!!, 2021-09-01, Lost and Found Event Cache, GC2GP44: Playa, 2012-03-01, Earthcache, ...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Slight tweak to the output which might help clarity: 01 of any month: 12 GC8M98G: Community Celebration Wednesday Night Pizza!!!, 2021-09-01, Lost and Found Event Cache, GC2GP44: Playa, 2012-03-01, Earthcache, As far as the limit of 7, that's because there are only 7 months with 31 days. If you require 8 different icons on each day, at least two of them would have to have been found onby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Would something like this work? https://project-gc.com/Challenges//74843 Also, you should be aware that 7 would be the highest you'd be allowed to set the thresholds at for this exact type of challenge, as 8 or more would require at least two finds on the same date (and would therefore violate guideline 9).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, averages are not allowed to be used as challenge conditions, as it violates guideline 14: QuoteNot acceptable Not finding caches: design that limits or punishes any element of finding caches. Examples: Challenges that require ratios in finds; such as 10% of finds must be Attended logs, challenges that require finding only some particular type for over time, as 100 consecutive Mystery findby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I disagree about there not being any creativity allowed. If anything, constraints can increase the creativity needed. Take, for example, Dr Seuss' "Green Eggs and Ham", which was written with a vocabulary of 50 words.by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
Sorry, lab caches are not allowed as challenge cache criteria under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable Trackable, Benchmarking, Waymarking logs, or specifying Lab Cache finds.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA40R8/74499 Please confirm it is suitable. Also, please note that at least some reviewers will only publish a challenge with multiple paths to succeed if the CO has completed all sub-challenges.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Whoops, didn't save properly. Try again now.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, missed this for a while. Script has been adjusted.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, titles are no longer allowed as challenge conditions under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable These cache page elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer, or cache page text.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Removed my tagby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA2R2V/73358 Please confirm it is suitable. Note that this checker excludes Reverse (Locationless) caches by default. I could allow them, but they're problematic (due to changing location). I think it's better to leave it as all types except that one. Edit: changed to a different script which handles Lab caches.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker removed as the cache was published with different criteria.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hadn't kept my script up to date with the change to the one I'd incorporated. It's updated now. Here's your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA1Q4W/72586 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I agree with you. It's a non-challenge with ALR.by sumbloke - Challenge checker exceptions
This wouldn't be allowed under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable Trackable, Benchmarking, Waymarking logs, or specifying Lab Cache finds. It's also arguable that it would not be allowed under guideline 14: QuoteNot acceptable Not finding caches: design that limits or punishes any element of finding caches. Examples: Challenges that require ratios in finds; such as 10% of finds mustby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Script adjusted. You can update your tag to match the new example.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Conditions 1 and 3 are fine. 2, 4 and 5 are not allowed under guideline 9: QuoteNot acceptable Time-limited caching: as in some number of finds per day, week, month, or year. Examples: Busy Day, 50 finds in a day, 500 finds in a month, etc.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9XDQN/71382 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)