Target., can you update the example to work with the current version of sandbox (standard table.sort instead of TableSort, pairs instead of Pairs, ...)by Jakuje - Script development
It can be used as a checker whether I qualify or not (which is helpful), but unfortunately it is no help with composing the logs according to the requirements. But better than nothing. Thank you.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
There is a challenge cache that I visited recently and is missing a checker. It requires multiple conditions to be fulfilled so it is harder to match it against currently existing checkers (as I did not write one for some time). But it might be easier for somebody else. If not, I will do that later. The requirements: at least 30 caches during one day, at least 9 different D/T combinations dby Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, pieterix is correct. The Charts Checker checks either for a normal jasmer or for "years" jasmer. Adjusting it to do both of that in different way would be quite complicated. I can have a look into writing that script, but I can not promise it. I have less time that I used to have to PGC at the moment.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh ... bad link, I meant the profile stats problem: http://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=13325/profile-janinge68-not-found-names-are-case-sensitiveby Jakuje - Miscellaneous
Seems like this batch of changes broke profile stats (sorry for being off-topic, but it looked like festest way to reach you): http://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=13320/is-self-support-working&show=13329#c13329by Jakuje - Miscellaneous
The "Charts challenges" checker basically uses the checkers as they were made by other authors and returns `ok` as conjunction of `ok` results of all the other used ones (and merges logs and output). If every checker will have some unique name, all of that can be somehow put together and even use them directly from the config and without any need to create a new "superset"by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I clearly agree with that, but there is still no such possibility and it was the main reason why the discussed script was created. If I remember, there was some discussion about this topic years ago (can't find it now), but it was never put together. Feel free to bring this topic up again in the general checkers discussion. Unfortunately I am not much active in checkers so I will not bby Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I updated the script from the original one by pinkunicorn. Thanks for letting me know. Let me know if it does what you wanted now. http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6ZV2P/24586by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Target, thank you for having a look into that. I added it to ignore "older" caches, which solved the problem. For both ChrisDen and iPajero. Sorry for the trouble.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry for the problems. There was one more off-by-one error (total months get counted before excluding current month). Should work fine now.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird already wrote me about this problem. The problem is the interval from "today - 120 months" to "today" is in fact 121 months. I modified the script to "compensate" this problem, unless there is "exclude_current_month" set to make it working as expected in all cases. Let me know if it is what you need.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I added the GC code to the checker: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6WNE3/23160by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker is here: http://project-gc.com/Challenges//23160 Let me know, when you will have the GC code. I will attach to the checker. Unfortunately, all 120 months do not fit into the log so it might be truncated, but the output on the site shows all of them.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well ... October 2007-September 2016 ... is only 9 years and therefore you don't pass the challenge and you can't publish it. Anyway I have got a checker on the way so I will let you know as soon as it will be production-ready :)by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If you run the ckecker with my name, you should be able to see the how it looks if you do not fulfil the challenge. It will report the conditions (this is for cacher with even less finds): QuoteFail: I had only 1770 total FPs on found caches of 10000 needed Fail: I had only 0 total loops of 1 needed and then the fizzy grid with fulfilling caches (>=10 FP). Yes, the numbers in the gridby Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
According to the official rules, yes: > Challenge cache owners must show that they have met the challenge. (new 2016)by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
You can use for example "Generic simple number checker func": http://project-gc.com/Tools/Challenges?edit&addTag&scriptId=969 with config {"types":["Letterbox Hybrid"],"limit":1500} but I don't think you found this amount of Letterbox caches yourself (according to stats) so it will most probably not be published. There are only 3 peopleby Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I modified a checker to match this challenge: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6Q1X6/23144 Let me know if it satisfies your needs or you wish some broader reports in the logs.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well ... you are right. It is nothing that can't be worked around, but my initial though was that extension of API would bring more flexibility, less of copy-paste code throughout a lot of checkers and finally lower amount of data transferred back and forth. But if this is not a problem anymore, I don't mind solving these request your explained way.by Jakuje - Method requests
Thanks for the review. I somehow missed this requirement in the original request. It was fixed and now there is requirement for different cache types.by Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Would it be possible to add a possibility to filter caches in GetFinds by the amount of FP awarded to to this cache? It would simplify the creation of the checker below (would need slight modification of existing, instead of writing a new one). I believe it would be also useful for different checkers handling favorites. Using filter is more effective than filtering afterwards. http://project-gby Jakuje - Method requests
> every digit 0-9 in the caches posted coordinates. In which format DD MM.MMM or in DD.DDDDD.... ? In what precision? 3 digits or more? This needs to be set unambiguously. Anyway, I created a checker for you, which handles this according to my best effort: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6T33C/23058 Let me know, it if satisfies your needs or there is something you would like to hby Jakuje - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You probably don't have permission to clone the tags. What cache do you want to create tag and from which tag?by Jakuje - Miscellaneous