https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7CTK7/28933 gives error for user Czechsun. :235: attempt to concatenate a boolean value Getting finds. Filter is Array ( => 2000-05-01 => 2019- 8-26 => Array ( [1] => Letterbox Hybrid [2] => 10 Years! Event Cache [3] => Traditional Cache [4] => Groundby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Thanks so much. I shall return one day with a request for a similar challenge but requiring 78 points (Average 3.0). After I qualify myself first, of course!by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Do I need to wait for you to move the script from testing8 to production?by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That looks great now. I believe we are done. and that was fast too, thanks. I shall resubmit shortly to the reviewer for my Challenge Cache.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, remove Caching Veteran. that one is not allowed per Challenge rules. Makes sense that you wouldn't allow a challenge based on the number of years you've been caching. that takes my score down to 76. and don't forget to show on the Score line, the Average which is Score / 26. in my case 76 / 26 = 2.92 and it's unclear to me what you are trying to show with thby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
as a test - If you run it for me DrPflug, I should have 76 points. The last checker gave me that and I just manually checked my badges.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
1. Remove APE Cacher 2. Remove Lost & Found Cacher 3. Add Long-Distance Cacher 4. Computed value for the Calendar Cacher is wrong. It gives me 0, when in fact I should have 4 (for all 366 days).by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I am working on a similar challenge as well.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Yes it is. But only for the badges whose data is available from geocaching.com and which meet the current guidelines for a challenge cache. See https://coord.info/GC8APB9by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
ok, pietrix, here is the final answer about my challenge: "Here's where we've ended up. It's a long story with a lot of input and back and forth, but here is a brief summary and the end result: The concept of the challenge is OK. However, as things currently stand, the checker is a problem. The reason that the checker is problematic is that it is based on data from a souby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Vertighost just put this note in the log. so hold off a bit. "I assumed that more levels would follow this one, but before you ask the developer for your checker to rewrite it, let me look into whether what you mentioned would work. It may take a day or two or a bit more to get a satisfactory answer. Please bear with me on this. "by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is the reply: After much discussion, unfortunately, this challenge cannot be published as it currently exists. The problem is that the checker assigns number values to the different BadgeGen badge levels, then checks the account based on the badge levels, rather than finding counts on geocaching.com. It's possible that you may be able to adjust the challenge so that it checks Geocachinby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It's perfect! Thanks. I will submit now to the Reviewer and get his feedback. Hopefully he says it's all good.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Great! Very Nice! can 2 small changes be made. 1. Could you add this on line 1 "Average Gemstone score = x.x" after the words "required points". So my results would say: I have 76 out of 52 required points. Average Gemstone score = 2.92 2. Could the level of each of the 26 badges be shown in all cases? So in my case, in addition to the 23 badges for which I haveby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
thanks, I have contacted support via e-mail. you can close this request.by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
thanks, you can close this request.by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
Can someone pls have a look at this ? Am I right or wrong? If right, can it be fixed?by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
I see. I thought there was probably a table somewhere that could easily be referenced that held the number of counties for each region in every country and that number could be referenced when the maps for each region were generated for a user. But if not, then I see. It was just a minor suggestion. This request can be closed. Thanks for the reply.by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
Hi pieterix - are you able now to get back and look at developing this checker now?by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
project-gc is reporting that this cache https://coord.info/GC7JT8K is in United States / North Carolina / Swain County (NC), BUT in fact it's in Tennessee just like the cache owner listed it. Leaflet maps also shows it in Tennessee. Can this be fixed?by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
Is there a place to post about topics that are not challenge checker related? I don't see such a place. so I will post it here. On the Individual States Map, using Mississippi as an example, it says, "9 counties found in United States, Mississippi". Could the total number of counties in Mississippi be included on that line, e.g. "9/82 counties found in United States,by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
thanks. and I am not in any rush. So take your time. I will also add back the long-distance cacher badge as badge #26. so 52 points required to average 2.0 and all four gemstone levels will be available for the calendar cacher.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
question about the Long-Distance cacher badge and being used in Challenges. If I look at someone else's statistics on GC.com, I don't see the Cache Id of the cache that they found that was furthest from their home, but it does show me the distance. Is the reason because the Checker would need to get the Cache id in order to compute the distance itself because the distance from home vby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
OK, I will eliminate the Busy Cacher and Long-Distance Cacher. and for the Calendar Cacher, I will make Emerald badge (365 days) for 3 points the maximum. so 50 points total needed to qualify. 50/25 = 2.0 average. Can a Checker be done for that?by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Can I get a checker for this contemplated challenge? GC8A0M8 For this challenge check your BadgeGen tab in your project-gc stats. There are 27 badges (out of 39) whose level can be determined from stats that are available from Geocaching.com stats and also meet the current guidelines for a Challenge cache. To meet the qualifications for this challenge, you simply need 54 points from theby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I first noticed this last month after those 225 or so new challenges in Dallas Co got published and I was only seeing less than 10 of those 225. Odd! I still see less than 10. So its been this way for me for a while now. It seems that there is some hidden filter somewhere limiting what I see. I have "Show All" selected and only "Exlude Archived". For Williamson CO TX thby DrPflug - Miscellaneous
Map of Challenge Checkers doesn't show all Challenges - at least not for me. For example, Williamson County TX has 28 Challenges currently. But when I do the Map of Challenge Checkers for that region, it shows me just 8. and it's that way for every region. I just see a small subset of the available challenges. What could be wrong?by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
this checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6GAMW/20369 returns this error for me: :83: attempt to compare boolean with string It runs fine for user Czechsun with these results: **I make it with 432 finds from 1 hiders and I only needed 100 finds from any hiders that joined Geocaching.com between 2000-05-03 and 2009-12-31** **Bigguy In Texas** joined on **2006-03-05** andby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Tested and it's good. Thank you!by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This checker was set up for 65 positive attributes. Can it please be changed to check for 64. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7MZ8D/34193by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)