Ah, okay. I understand your question a bit better now. Above the grey box on the checker page, you should have a tab bar with "Find checkers" selected. Do you get a tab "Find script"? If so, this would be the way to search for appropriate scripts.by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
Assuming you are registered as a tagger (because the script keywords and description are only really useful to taggers): On the right side of that checker page, you should see a "button" labelled "Tag script". If you click on that, you will be navigated to the script page, on the "Show tags" tab. There will be a grey box at the top of the page, containing the sby sumbloke - Miscellaneous
The smallest geographic division allowed is counties (or equivalent). So neither of your examples would be allowed. You could have Delaware County (OK) and Delaware state or Nevada County (CA) and Nevada state or Washington County (any of 30+ states) and Washington state.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
As far as who has tagging rights, two approaches you could use: 1. Look at who has responded in the forum to other requests. 2. Look through some other challenges and see who is listed as "Tagged by". As long as it's not a cloned checker (which will be "tagged by" the CO, but will also have a comment including "Cloned from tag ....."), the tagger will have tagby sumbloke - Miscellaneous
I've changed it to be any state of USA, not District of Columbia (which currently doesn't have any caches with the power trail attribute)by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The cache name is no longer allowed to be used as challenge criteria, but they have introduced an attribute for power trails. Here's a checker based on that attribute: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9P0D5/66582 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It also wouldn't be allowed under guideline 14: QuoteNot acceptable Not finding caches: design that limits or punishes any element of finding caches. Examples: Challenges that require ratios in finds; such as 10% of finds must be Attended logs, challenges that require finding only some particular type for over time, as 100 consecutive Mystery finds.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Okay, cancelling request.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I'm not aware of any such challenges so far, but it would be easy enough to make a checker for.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9N1JC/66070 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9M32V/65987 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It's been around for a while, but never written down (which annoys us). It's a Groundspeak requirement that we've only found out about from reviewers who comment here.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9MHDJ/65765 Please note that we've been told that for challenges with multiple paths to qualification, the CO needs to have completed all. You have only found 20 hunting area finds, so don't qualify for one path.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9MMJQ/65764 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, cache owners are no longer allowed as challenge criteria, under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable These cache page elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer, or cache page text.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Re-enabled as requested.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've added "Lost and Found Event Cache", which is what the Community Celebration Events show up as in the checker system.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The challenge has been published without the "Challenge cache" attribute, so the checker system has automatically disabled the checker. Please advise PharmerCarin to add that attribute and let me know when they have so I can re-enable the checker.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ah, okay. That makes sense. Here's a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9JG32/64744 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Responded in the original thread.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9K3YZ/64754 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Quoteall caches MUST be found in Illlinois but not in Cook, Will, DuPage, or st clair counties GC54EKT appears to be in DuPage County, GC15RA0 appears to be in Will County.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Getting partway through tagging a script (ran out of space for the tag, so might need to alter some criteria if there was to be further work), it seems you're well short of most of these criteria. The advice we've had from reviewers is that a CO must meet all criteria, even if not all are required for a user to claim the challenge.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, this is not allowed under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceoptable Trackable, Benchmarking, Waymarking logs, or specifying Lab Cache finds.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The direction from HQ, which we've heard through reviewers, is that even if only some sub-challenges are required to meet the challenge, the CO is required to meet all before the challenge can be published. I'm just trying to warn you that your reviewer is likely to reject this challenge (at this time).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9F8TR/64656 Sorry, it took a little while to get a chance to enhance my script to handle a few of the conditions. Please note that you will need to meet all sub-challenges to get your challenge published, and you currently only meet 11 of them (unless I mis-interpreted some).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Looks like I made the previous one, so only appropriate that I create this one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J9DM/64302 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh, okay. Definitely not in the checker system then, since it only gets caches from the Groundspeak API. I've heard about Geocaching Australia (another additional system), which does add the ability to create several types you can't on the official site. Maybe opencaching is similar, where they thought the real site is too restrictive.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, this type of challenge isn't allowed under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable These cache page elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer, or cache page text.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J97W/64301 Please confirm it is suitable. P.S., I'm not sure what you're referring to as "open geocaches". Benchmarks are not available in the checker system and lab caches are off by default.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
