KaiserVonChina Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'll play around with the new features a bit more > and let you know in case I observe something > unexpected. :thumbs up: (no such emoji, but you get the point)by magma1447 - Checker news
I have updated https://project-gc.com/forum/read?6,117489,117491#msg-117491 There are three new css classes: [*] table-condensed [*] text-smaller (smaller than text-small) [*] text-monospace-narrow (uses a narrower font than the text-monospace) Does it work as you expect with class table-condsensed? Otherwise I would need links.by magma1447 - Checker news
I have a reproduction case now. This is not how it looked months ago. Something must be missing.by magma1447 - Checker news
Examples please. There is nothing we can do if you don't provide the needed information.by magma1447 - Checker news
Code Example local args = {...} local conf = args[1].config local profileName = args[1].profileName local profileId = args[1].profileId local gccode = args[1].gccode -- gccode from the tag ok = true; local html = {} table.insert(html, "<p>Geocache type icon</p>") table.insert(html, PGC.Icon.GeocacheType('Traditional Cache')) table.insert(htmby magma1447 - Checker news
CSS Classes Table styles table-bordered table-striped table-condensed Coloring Background colors bg-primary bg-secondary bg-success bg-danger bg-warning bg-info bg-light bg-dark Text colors text-primary text-secondary text-success text-danger text-warning text-info text-light text-dark Text formatting align-left align-center align-right text-small (87.5%) text-smaller (75.0%) tby magma1447 - Checker news
Helper functions PGC.Icon.GeocacheType(type) - Returns an icon as an <i> html tag. PGC.Icon.GeocacheSize(size) - Returns an icon as an <i> html tag. PGC.Icon.GeocacheFound() - Returns an icon as an <i> html tag. PGC.Icon.GeocacheOwned() - Returns an icon as an <i> html tag. PGC.Icon.Challenge() - Returns an icon as an <i> html tag. PGC.Icon.Check(large) - Returnsby magma1447 - Checker news
Today we accidentally slipped out the upcoming CSS changes for challenge checkers. And also some helper functions that can be used. The upside with this is that the checker output won't be affected by CSS changes on the site itself in the same way as before. It should also be easier to make a more unified look of things. (Note to self: Issue #238, dev3 scriptId 13758)by magma1447 - Checker news
Since the code isn't released yet, whatever you see now is irrelevant. The css file isn't there yet.by magma1447 - Checker news
This was actually merged into `master` ~2 days ago, so it will go live with the next release. It's not documented anywhere yet, but you'll find the css files at `/css/pgc-challenge-checkers.css` when released. Class `table-bordered` should solve the border thing, once releaesd.by magma1447 - Checker news
Germany has a new county since 2026-01-01, it enters Project-GC today. The new county is Hanau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/535895). If I understand it correctly it has been broken out of "Main-Kinzig-Kreis". It's a city that's not it's own "county". They are both in "region" Hessen. I'll quote one of the users who has reported thby magma1447 - Checker news
FraSoSi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is the "Geocaches found" the only one that needs > to be on public? For Challenge checkers yes. You need to expose your finds since the checker is going through your finds one by one. Parsing them and checking the information about the geocaches.by magma1447 - Miscellaneous
ivans Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Does this mean that the owner of the challenge > will have to ask lots of cachers and later on each > cacher to unlock their profile for a moment > because owner needs to verify that the > requirements have been met? You would probably have to direct those question to Geocaching HQ. It's their guidby magma1447 - Miscellaneous
Sam.and.Frank Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I hope so. This is going too far. Well, it's also contradictory to log challenges and not show what you have logged. So there are two sides to that coin.by magma1447 - Miscellaneous
joemanzh Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ...and by the way this is a step more from these > organizations to ignore people's privacy. WTF do > they want from us? It's the opposite. Your privacy is being respected. Your data is hidden away. That's why the checker can't be run.by magma1447 - Miscellaneous
A long Facebook thread with discussion about it: https://www.facebook.com/groups/843748755686122/ The copy/paste answer we have in our support system: Quote You should have received a popup telling you that your privacy settings at geocaching.com (https://www.geocaching.com/account/settings/userprivacy) is preventing some of the functionality on Project-GC. This is new and a change that Geocaby magma1447 - Miscellaneous
There hasn't been a new release of the site yet. There is another thing kind of blocking it. If it was a smaller patch I would have squeezed it in regardless. But this time I have had to hold it back a bit.by magma1447 - Script development
Updating polygons for Croatia. It used to have 2 regions and 21 counties. We are now correcting this data. The old regions are getting removed. The old "counties" are getting promoted into being "regions" which is more correct. And then we are adding a new layer for counties. The new layer will be 555+1=556 polygons. Where the 1 is Zagrab (identical to the region polygonby magma1447 - Checker news
A patch that fixes this has been pushed to git. It's not released yet. Planning a release sometime this week.by magma1447 - Script development
The script has a disabled tag, owned by someone else. From what I can see in the code you can't see such tags. It might be worth add the disabled ones as well though.by magma1447 - Script development
bmuzzin Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I still think that instead of a narrow library > provided by the service, it would be way more > beneficial to allow importing of other scripts... While it's not a bad idea it's a lot more work to do it properly, depending on how it would be done. A correctly implemented way to do that would be abouby magma1447 - Checker news
That won't work with the sandbox. If that (require) worked you could include any file on the filesystem. That's why this is sandboxed and not all LUA functions are available. So whatever is made here will always be included. Therefore it will most likely belong under the "PGC namespace", to avoid collisions with anything else.by magma1447 - Checker news
There has been some progress on this task and I am hoping for a release next week. When the release has been made I will first have a single person test it out. After that I will post in the News section on this forum about it. When that has been live for some time I get back to you and ask for snippets for these I think: - Count() that works regardless whether you pass an indexed or an associby magma1447 - Checker news
You can always contact Project-GC about it. This is not how it's meant to work and look. Project-GC does what it can to clean up duplicates. But it can't really auto-clean tags that actually have different results. It then doesn't know which is correct or why there are two. We'll do a manual clean here. Taxoft has been creating tags for ~10 years now, so there is most liby magma1447 - Miscellaneous
https://forums.geocaching.com/GC/index.php?/topic/426673-challenge-cache-criteria-update/by magma1447 - Checker news
We'll be updating Switzerland's polygon data today. The primary reason is this user feedback: Quote On 26. APRIL 2025 there is a new district called Lema This is an Fusion of the following "gemeinden" Astano, Bedi, Gliora, Curio, Miglieglia and Novaggio. Switzerland is hard to grasp with the "endless" amount of "counties". We have done our best to vby magma1447 - Checker news
In my opinion at least some of those should be worth having in a common library.by magma1447 - Checker news