Whoops, sorry. I did miss that. I've added them now. Seems like a bit of a strange limitation, I can only really see reason for excluding Locationless, but still...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can't see a way to check it with existing scripts. Shouldn't be too difficult a script to write, but I won't have time until next week.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC4V96E/22122 You seem to be five elevation ranges short of meeting it.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The challenge conditions do not lend themselves to a simple tag, so I believe a new script would be required. This is likely to be low on most script-writers' priorities since the script would have limited usefulness given such challenges are no longer allowed.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I have removed my tag.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have removed my tag.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6PM4T/22107by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6PM18/22106 Apparently you have 1817, so even more qualified than you said.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I already provided a link to the guidelines and specified which guideline this would contravene in your previous thread: http://project-gc.com/forum/read?10,2561by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Unfortunately, challenges based on cache names are no longer allowed.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
This type of challenge is not allowed under the new guidelines, particularly guideline 10. See http://support.groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=206 I'm cancelling this request, but feel free to change your challenge criteria and request a new checker in a new thread.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC4EQAQ/22072 It looks like at least nine of the last ten finders have used the distances from home method, since only one of ten qualifies using the cache-to-cache distance.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ah, found how to do it. Fixed now.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That particular script doesn't seem to have any option to list the unfound counties. If you can point me to any county checker which does, I'm happy to re-tag this challenge.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, missed that attribute. I've added it now.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
For an issue with an existing tag, please contact the tagger. You can use the envelope icon next to "Tagged by: ..." on the checker page.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
To clarify, do you mean countries as defined by Groundspeak, or does Groundspeak actually have a list of which countries are in Europe? If the latter, I haven't seen that list, so could you provide a link?by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm pretty sure this wouldn't be allowed under the guidelines. Guideline 9 says you can have a streak only as one per day without other restrictions and to a maximum of 365 days. Guideline 14 says you can't have challenges where it's a competition rather than an achievement (they give FTFs as an example, but this one would also be competing to find the cache before the day eby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
The challenge will not be allowed with the "exactly" part in there, as it conflicts with guideline 14 (it punishes people for finding additional caches) Also, the challenge would only be allowed if it's by date rather than day, so you can accumulate the finds on one date through multiple years (guideline 9) http://support.groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=206by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6P2T1/22031 I've tagged it on the assumption you will allow the cache owners to count their caches (could be a bit rough on them otherwise). Let me know if you want that changed.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6P48Z/22030 Two notes: "Moving caches" can't be detected as there is no consistent attributes to look for. For the same reason it wouldn't be allowed as an exclusion under the current guidelines. This checker doesn't check for self-signed caches. It would be possible to have a new script written which could do that, buby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6NWWG/21987 Please make a note on your cache page that the Project-GC calculations will not include finds of lab caches or gemstone-level badges of The Benchmarker, The Waymarker, The Night-Owl or The Scuba-Cacherby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Also, the twelve hour part would never have been able to be tested in a challenge checker, since the logs only have a date, not a time.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
This is a grandfathered challenge and does not need to adhere to the new guidelines.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have changed the GC code on that tag. In the future, please contact me directly because I'm unlikely to notice a comment in an archived thread. When you go to the checker page, next to "Tagged by: ..." there's an envelope icon. Click on that to contact the tagger directly.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Bear in mind that guideline 5 includes: A challenge cache needs to appeal to and be attainable by a reasonable number of cachers. Your reviewer may ask for a list of cachers from your area who qualify.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6NC6V/21891by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That would be because the new rules are that the only geographic restrictions you can place on finds are country, state/province or county (or their local equivalents). Marking this thread as cancelled, since the reviewer has denied the cache.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Also, please bear in mind that reviewers have stated that areas other than countries, states/provinces and counties (or their equivalents) are not allowed for challenges. These minute squares would not be allowed (unless you have a very generous reviewer).by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
It would certainly be possible, but would need someone (you) to put together a list of state connections. See project-gc.com/forum/read?11,332 for an idea of the appropriate format.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)